Sri Lanka wait on Jayasuriya injury

Sanath Jayasuriya: should be back in the team for the more important matches ahead© AFP

Sri Lanka are hopeful that Sanath Jayasuriya will recover in time for their opening second-round match in the Asia Cup on Wednesday after aggravating a side injury and pulling out of their clash against India on Sunday.Jayasuriya, Sri Lanka’s most experienced one-day player and their highestrun-scorer, first injured his left side during the first Test against Australiaat Darwin earlier in the month. The management had hoped his batting wouldbe unhindered.”Sanath [Jayasuriya] suffered the side strain in Darwin Test where he bowled30 overs,” Ajit Jayasekera, the team manager, told reporters on Sundayafternoon. “In Cairns [the second Test] it became sore.”He discovered the full extent of the injury while batting yesterday and wasfeeling uncomfortable when he played his square-cut. He nowneeds some rest but we feel he should be fit enough for Wednesday.”If Sri Lanka lose against India then they will face Bangladesh onWednesday at the Sinhalese Sports Club, a low-key game that Jayasuriya couldsit out to give the injury more time to heal.

Harmison opts out of Zimbabwe tour

Steve Harmison has taken a moral stand on the Zimbabwe issue and decided to not tour© Getty Images

Steve Harmison has ruled himself out of England’s controversial tour ofZimbabwe, which is to take place in November. The series consists of five one-dayers and no Tests.Harmison decided to boycott the trip for political and sporting reasons. A few months ago, Stuart MacGill publicly stated his intention to not visit Zimbabwe for the same reasons.”In all honesty,” said Harmison to the , “my decision was made in Cape Town over 18 months ago when England’s World Cup squad spent a horrendous four days before finally deciding not to go to Harare.”Nothing has changed for me. The situation there is worse now – that’s whatthe official reports say – and Zimbabwe’s top players have been sacked.”A spokesman for the England & Wales Cricket Board said that Harmison was the only player to have expressed a desire to stay at home, but added that no disciplinary action would be taken.”Stephen Harmison informed Duncan Fletcher and Michael Vaughan following the ICC Champions Trophy match against Sri Lanka that he did not want to be considered for selection for the forthcoming tour of Zimbabwe.”As the ECB has concluded that the tour must go ahead subject to it being safe and secure to do so, we have asked all the current England players and management to make themselves available. Stephen Harmison is the only player to have informed the board that he will be unavailable for the tour.”The ECB has previously stated that any player who makes himself unavailable to tour Zimbabwe for reasons of personal conscience will not be penalised and this remains our position.”

Clarke enjoys the sensational hundred

Michael Clarke: a sensational home debut© Getty Images

Michael Clarke
On his first hundred at home
That was special. I had a lot of family watching and I was getting sent text messages last night. And what an unbelievable day to see Glenn McGrath make his first Test fifty – that’s close to the best thing I’ve seen in cricket.On batting with Adam Gilchrist
There wasn’t much talk [about the hundred] till before the last ball. He asked me how I was feeling and I said, “I’ll tell you after this ball.” It turned out well.On the shot to bring up his hundred
Last ball before lunch all I was thinking about was getting through to lunch, but the ball just happened to be in the right spot. Luckily for me it came out of the middle of the bat.On comparing the innings to his debut hundred
They were very different, the conditions and circumstances. I can’t compare them, both are as special as each other. It’s always great to play in front of an Australian crowd.On coping with the pressure of high standards
Unfortunately in life some things don’t go to plan. At the moment for me in Test cricket they have gone to plan, but there are going to be down times and I know that and expect that. I want to continue to make the most of the good times.On his first Test in Australia
I was very nervous, but I’m nervous every time I play so I don’t find that difficult to accept. I try to listen to as much music as I can before I bat. I’ve got the ipod on so I listen to whatever’s on that.On his family being there to watch
My mum’s here with my aunt and my sister. Unfortunately dad had to work, but I’m pretty sure he watched it. I’m pretty sure I’ll talk to him tonight if he’s not too pissed – he’ll be doing some celebrating.On McGrath’s half-century
It’s so unbelievable, Glenn works so hard on his batting. He’s a fantastic bowler but he really deserves a Test fifty. Everybody but Justin Langer put their whites on when Glenn went out, we thought we’d be fielding in a few balls.On Australia batting tomorrow
I’m pretty sure they’ll definitely continue batting so Jason Gillespie can get his first Test fifty.

Eight for McGrath the Great

Glenn McGrath was simply outstanding in the face of spineless batting© Getty Images

At his best Glenn McGrath looks like he’s jogging to the crease. He trotted in the second innings and captured the second-best figures by an Australian. Only after he’d reached seven victims, and thoughts turned to a perfect ten, did he start to charge. Michael Kasprowicz’s two wickets helped him decide eight was enough.There have been some great fast bowling performances at the WACA and this, statistically, was the finest. It was stunning and special, but in McGrath’s list of 472 Test wickets these were some of the easiest. Curtly Ambrose blitzed Australia with 7 for 25, including a spell of 7 for 1, to win a series in 1992-93, and Merv Hughes and Craig McDermott crashed eight through West Indies and England sides boasting star line-ups. McGrath swept through a disappointing rabble.Sensing weaknesses has always been one of his specialties. All he had to do today was look towards the opposition’s dressing-room. The batting was simply awful; McGrath simply too good. Starting the morning with 1 for 6, he had added six wickets by his ninth over and found edges as easily as a rock climber. The eighth took longer – by then Kasprowicz had knocked over Mohammad Sami – and came with a Shoaib Akhtar bunt to Darren Lehmann, McGrath’s only dismissal in front of the wicket.Nothing about his bowling had changed significantly, although there was a touch of outswing. The pace was still in the low 130kmph bracket, the line was annoyingly around off stump and the bounce was uncomfortable. Pakistan were trapped, and responded with open blades. The worst thing about their performance was the lack of improvement.Some tours are over in less than the three weeks they have stayed in Perth. Visiting teams will always struggle with the WACA’s bounce, but they usually develop some method of resistance. This was Pakistan’s seventh bat in Western Australia: they had learned nothing.

The end came too fast as McGrath ran red hot© Getty Images

They were still trying to play forward (Salman Butt and Younis Khan); they were hanging their bats out waiting for the edge (Abdul Razzaq, Inzamam-ul-Haq and Kamran Akmal); and they religiously prodded without purpose. Had Justin Langer been Australia’s only batsman, they would have won by 37 runs. It was a horrible display from a side ranked fourth in the world. There wasn’t even time for a dreadful run out.Playing the first Test at Perth had been a risk for Australia. While their bowlers would always dominate, Shoaib and Sami could – and did – spark a demolition. Once their danger had passed Australia were heading to the MCG with a 1-0 lead. Ricky Ponting made sure the match went into a fourth day, and Glenn McGrath made it memorable.Strangely, McGrath had never taken a Test five-wicket haul at Perth. Now the figures of 8 for 24, 14 runs fewer than his previous best at Lord’s in 1997, stand only behind Arthur Mailey’s 9 for 121 against England in 1920-21. It is a fitting milestone for a bowler destined to remain in Australia’s top three alongside Dennis Lillee and Shane Warne unless another country kid spectacularly caravans his way towards 500 dismissals.

Tendulkar mauls Bangladesh

Scorecard and ball-by-ball details

Sachin Tendulkar equalled Sunil Gavaskar’s record after a flurry of strokes© Getty Images

It was another day at Dhaka when history, rather than competition, was the talk of the town. Sachin Tendulkar’s glittering hundred, his 34th in Tests, put him alongside Sunil Gavaskar in the century stakes and put India in absolute control of the opening Test. Bangladesh created openings for themselves, especially in the first session, but they closed the door with some shambolic catching that let India off. And India went on to make them pay, as they piled on 348 for 7 by the end of the second day, with a lead of 164.On his way to the summit Tendulkar stumbled twice, only for Bangladesh’s fielders to prop him right back up. Habibul Bashar fluffed a regulation catch at first slip while Rajin Saleh juggled and then grassed one at silly mid-off. Sourav Ganguly and Dinesh Karthik were also given second lives as the butter-fingered brigade came out in force. Bangladesh had had the better of the first session, with Mashrafe Mortaza unsettling the Indian top order, but ragged fielding gradually eroded their morale.Tendulkar’s century wasn’t flawless, and edgy moments interspersed gorgeous drives. When he was let off after being foxed by the bowlers, he made the fielders pay. While he was content to play the percentages in the early stages, with controlled square-drives to wide deliveries, he unfurled his range as the day progressed. After reaching the 30s, there were assured front-foot punches. A jaw-dropping back-foot straight-drive followed – done with minimum fuss and maximum efficiency – and he then raced past the 90s with a flurry of fours.On reaching his hundred he joined an elite club of Gary Kirsten and Steve Waugh as the only men to have scored Test centuries against all countries. As stumps approached he improvised with sweeps and glances, including one where he walked across the stumps, met the ball at the very last moment with an angled bat that sent it to the fine-leg fence. By this point it was a walk in the park.Tendulkar’s innings was the main ingredient but the Indian innings also contained some delectable touches of spice. Sourav Ganguly skipped to 71 and manhandled slow bowlers along the way, while Gautam Gambhir displayed fine touch before his innings was cut short by a communication breakdown. VVS Laxman performed a most melodious rendition before his voice cracked and Dinesh Karthik had a joyful hitting session towards the end of the day. It was Ganguly’s effort, though, that helped put India back on track after the Bangladesh new-ball bowlers had pegged his team back.

Sehwag walks back after being trapped in front by Tapash Baisya© Getty Images

Tapash Baisya and Mortaza had bowled wonderfully in tandem and reduced India to 68 for 3. Mortaza zeroed in on a narrow channel outside the off stump and the subtle cut that he produced hurried the batsmen into indiscretion. He troubled Virender Sehwag with his zip and gave Rahul Dravid a torrid examination after Baisya trapped Sehwag lbw. Dravid’s defence was clumsy, with the moving ball creating doubts. He fell to one such misjudgement, shouldering arms to one from Mortaza that nipped back in and uprooted off stump (24 for 2).Both Tendulkar and Gambhir seized the moment when Mortaza was taken off the attack. Mushfiqur Rahman, the first-change bowler, bled 15 in his first two overs as the batsmen stepped up a gear. Then, suddenly, a fierce punch by Tendulkar was intercepted by Rajin Saleh at point but he stayed his ground leaving Gambhir, who had charged half-way down the pitch, stranded(68 for 3).That fielding effort was a shimmer in the dark, though, as Ganguly and Tendulkar wrested back the initiative. Ganguly began cautiously and survived a few hiccups along the way but he mauled the left-arm spinners. Both Rafique and Manjural were put off their length as Ganguly skipped down the track and lofted them to the straight boundary. Ganguly showed all the qualities that had made him a tormentor of the best spin attacks in the past and he rendered the square fielders redundant as well. The stream of boundaries slowly turned into a torrent as Ganguly eased a few fours of the medium-pacers. But he fell right at the stroke of tea, undone by one that straightened, sneaked through the gate and crashed into his stumps (232 for 4).The rest of the day was about Tendulkar and his gamboling friends as first Laxman and then Karthik thrilled in bursts. Unlike the rest, Tendulkar didn’t throw it away and will return with his record-shredder tomorrow. It was fitting that he was joined by Anil Kumble right at the end of the day, as the two men who ruled the first two days of the series walked off amid the fading light.

Board holds talks with rebels

The first tentative steps to try to bring back the remaining rebel players came on Tuesday when some of them met with Zimbabwe Cricket officials in Harare.The two sides were reported to have had a cordial meeting, but one independent source said that the three unnamed committee members, who were backed by two lawyers, "were open-minded but very poorly informed by ZC on the basics of the dispute." They said they had not come to negotiate but merely to hear the players’ proposals and take them back to the board.Although ZC has made the right noises about its willingness to make peace with the rebels, it is widely believed that the presence of Ozias Bvute (ZC’s general manager) and Max Ebrahim (the chief selector) on the board remains the main, and substantial, stumbling block. Both are seen as being at the heart of the dispute.Another meeting has been planned for next week.

Seymore puts combined team in charge

Combined Easterns/Northerns XI 132 for 2 (Kuhn 47, Seymore 77*) trail Zimbabweans 206 (Chigumbura 40, Morkel 3-57, Abrahams 3-36, Harris 3-51) by 74 runs
Scorecard

Elton Chigumbura top-scored with 40 on a disappointing day for Zimbabwe© Getty Images

An unbeaten 77 from the captain Andre Seymore gave the Easterns/Northerns XI the upper hand on the first day of the tour match at Willowmoore Park in Benoni. After putting the Zimbabweans in and bowling them out for 206, the combined XI had reached 132 for 2 by the close.Seymore shared an opening stand of 125 with Heino Kuhn, before the uncapped slow left-armer Sean Williams took two quick wickets to brighten Zimbabwe’s day a little.When they batted, several of the Zimbabweans had made decent starts: seven of them reached double figures, but the highest score was only 40, by Elton Chigumbura, who eventually became one of three wickets for the Titans fast bowler Siraag Abrahams. Paul Harris and Morne Morkel also finished with three victims as Zimbabwe succumbed for 206.

Mohali beckons as the rivalry is renewed

How will the Mohali pitch play this time around?© Getty Images

A year on from an epochal Test series across the border, India and Pakistan will commence the latest episode of the most storied rivalry in all of sport. With all apologies to supporters of Celtic-Rangers, Barcelona-Real and Yankees-Red Sox, this is as good as it gets in the competitiveness-and-needle stakes. And while Sourav Ganguly admitted that it was “more than a series and part of a bridge-building process”, such altruistic motives will be far from players’ minds when they step out onto the Punjab Cricket Association Stadium turf at 10am tomorrow morning.The pitch, lovingly tended by Daljit Singh, has a deceptively verdanttinge, prompting thoughts of a fast-bowling Eden. But the curator insists that this is a surface that will have something for everyone, saying: “It will be an absolute belter on the second and third days.”The last Test at Mohali, against New Zealand 17 months ago, was as dreary as any played out in the snore-draw 1950s, but since then, there has been a lessening of the clay content and a switch to Bermuda grass, intended to restore Mohali to its mid-1990s heyday when the pitch was the most sporting in the country. This surface has been watered regularly, and could yet spring a nasty surprise on those expecting a bat-a-thon.Apart from the weather conditions, cool and sunny with spring in the air, a major factor will be the new SG ball, with the leather stretched tighter and the seam even more prominent than before. With Irfan Pathan and Rana Naved-ul-Hasan capable of extravagant swing, both sides will fancy their chancy under overcast skies. Inzamam-ul-Haq, who walked into the press conference with a typically somnolent air, reckoned that it would be a good pitch that would last the whole duration, and help the fast bowlers.

Danish Kaneria will hog the limelight in Shoaib Akhtar’s absence© Getty Images

However, he was also hopeful that Danish Kaneria, his trump card inShoaib Akhtar’s absence, would have a prominent part to play. “It should take some turn from the second day,” said Inzamam. “And Danish will be dangerous.” History though suggests that Kaneria has an onerous task – Pakistan’s greatest legspinner, Abdul Qadir, managed just six wickets in as many Tests on Indian soil.Pakistan’s full complement of bowlers has fewer wickets than Anil Kumble, and that lack of experience remains a concern. But Inzamam refused to accept that he was leading a weak team into a contest against a foe that inflicted innings defeats at Multan and Rawalpindi last year. “India have more experience, but we are not a weak side,” he said. “We may not be favourites, but my boys are capable of winning this series.”There was also praise for Bob Woolmer, whose tenure has been marked by constant sniping from the Pakistani media. “He has done new things, he’s more friendly with the boys,” said Inzamam. “He works hard with them in the nets. It’s only been five or six months, but if we give him time, he can go a good job.”

Tennis elbow or not, Sachin Tendulkar is preparing to do battle© Getty Images

Ganguly brushed off the favourites tag, saying that all teams wouldharbour the same nerves before the first Test of such an eagerly anticipated series, but accepted that he was in charge of the more worldly-wise team. “It’s a balanced side that’s been together for quite some time,” he said. “Many of the guys are at the peak of their game. But you must remember that no match is ever played on paper.”Yuvraj Singh, in blistering form on the domestic circuit, has been left out of the 12, as has Ashish Nehra, leaving Laxmipathy Balaji, Anil Kumble and Harbhajan Singh to tussle for two spots alongside the likely new-ball pairing of Irfan Pathan and Zaheer Khan. Pakistan have yet to decide on whether to risk the mercurial talents of Shahid Afridi, or stick to the more prosaic qualities that Asif Kamal brings to the middle order. With Naved still a spring chicken at Test level despite his relatively advanced years, Abdul Razzaq’s allround quality will certainly merit inclusion, especially given his penchant for skidding the ball at pace off the pitch.Ganguly, who walked in with the confident strut of a man secure in his job despite recent indifferent results, reckoned that the rivalry had long since surpassed the Ashes in the popularity stakes. And he admitted that one-day cricket had played a major role in altering the mindsets in both India and Pakistan, after decades of matches where the prime aim was to avoid defeat. “Cricket has changed, with far more decisions over the past few years. It’s played at a much faster pace, and one-day cricket has been responsible for that,” he said. However, he refused to give any weightage to the four ODI defeats that Pakistan have subjected India to since Woolmer took charge of the side. “Tests are a different game,” he said pithily.The Indian team management watched Pakistan’s performances in Australia, with an accent on the Tests where they did so poorly, and will also draw on memories of last year’s series when Pathan andBalaji comprehensively outbowled their Pakistani counterparts. This time round, Harbhajan will provide an additional edge, and despiteInzamam saying that his callow side could cope with the pressure of expectation – “conditions at the ground and the atmosphere are pretty much the same in India and Pakistan” – this could well be a bridge too far and too soon for a team that will undoubtedly miss the shock value, searing pace and maverick presence of a certain Shoaib Akhtar.India (likely) 1 Gautam Gambhir, 2 Virender Sehwag, 3 Rahul Dravid, 4 Sachin Tendulkar, 5 Sourav Ganguly (capt), 6 VVS Laxman, 7 Dinesh Karthik (wk), 8 Irfan Pathan, 9 Harbhajan Singh, 10 Anil Kumble, 11 Zaheer Khan.Pakistan (likely) 1 Salman Butt, 2 Yasir Hameed, 3 Younis Khan, 4 Yousuf Youhana, 5 Inzamam-ul-Haq (capt), 6 Asim Kamal, 7 Abdul Razzaq, 8 Kamran Akmal, 9 Mohammad Sami, 10 Rana Naved-ul-Hasan, 11 Danish Kaneria.

PCB XI down Leicestershire in Twenty20


Scorecard

Shabbir Ahmed: tight opening spell restricted Leicestershire© Getty Images

The PCB XI beat Leicestershire, the English Twenty20 champions, by 41 runs in the first Twenty20 match to be staged in Pakistan. Impressive innings from Khurram Manzoor and Shoaib Khan lifted the PCB XI to 162 for 7 from their 20 overs. Khurram faced just 27 balls for his 43, striking five fours and a six. Darren Maddy, who has had considerable success in the Twenty20 with his skiddy medium pace, was the pick of the attack with 3 for 18.Leicestershire were never in the hunt for their target, after Shoaib Akhtar and Shabbir Ahmed, an international opening pair, started with tight spells. Shabbir claimed the big wicket of Maddy before Mansoor Amjad, a young offspinner, picked up three middle-order scalps as the pressure mounted. Only John Sadler reached 20, and extras were the top-scorer of the innings with 26, as Leicestershire limped to 121 for 8.

The background to the dispute

The following statement was issued by Teddy Griffith, the West Indies Cricket Board president, on March 4, 2005

Teddy Griffith © Getty Images

Over the past several months, a number of issues surrounding West Indies Cricket has generated significant public comment. Central to these issues has been the relationship of the West Indies Cricket Board with the West Indies Players’ Association. There has also been avid discussion surrounding the Board’s sponsorship arrangementsDuring this period, the Board has consciously refrained from conducting in public its negotiations with the West Indies Players’ Association since, in its judgement, such an action would merely have served to harden positions around public stances, thereby rendering resolution even more difficult. Now, however, with the imminent commencement of the Digicel 2005 Home Series at the end of March, we have reached the stage where it is imperative that the Board’s position on the various issues be stated.Before I comment specifically on the two issues, let me first give an overview of the financial condition of the West Indies Cricket Board.The last occasion on which the Reserves of the West Indies Cricket Board were positive was in 1999, when the Board reported a Surplus of US$2.8 million.As a result of cumulative losses of US$16.0 million – US$5.4 million, US$7.7 million and US$2.9 million – in the next three financial years, the Board’s financial position had deteriorated to a deficit position of US$13.2 million by September 30, 2002. Profits generated in the 2003 and 2004 financial years have assisted in reducing the deficit to US$8.1 million at September 2004.The budgeted loss of $5.9 million in the current financial year will increase the company’s cumulative deficit to US$14.0 million by September 30, 2005.As a consequence of these poor financial results, the Board has operated for the majority of the period between 2000 and today under severe cash flow constraints. Indeed, as recently reported, the Board faces an unfunded cash deficit of an order of US$2.0 million during this current financial year.It is against this background that the Board has been negotiating, for the past several months, with the West Indies Players’ Association to conclude a Collective Labour Agreement, a Memorandum of Understanding, a Retainer Contract and a Match/Tour Contract. While agreement has been reached, in principle, on the Collective Labour Agreement and Memorandum of Understanding, and considerable progress has been made in agreeing the contents of the Match/Tour Contract, the parties have been unable to reach agreement on the financial terms attaching to the Retainer Contract.Let us look at each element individually.Retainer Contract
The Retainer is a guaranteed payment to the player for the period of the Retainer contract, typically a year. The payment is designed, among other things, to allow the contracted player to focus on his cricket year round whether or not he is selected to play for the West Indies team. Another impact of the retainer contract is to provide greater security for the contracted player in the event of injury.The Board’s proposal for compensation of players under contract consists of three (3) categories, as follows:

WICB offerWIPA offer
Category A+NA110,000
Category A79,200135,000
Category B31,68050,000
Category C26,40035,000
Based on the above and assuming a Retained Squad of sixteen (16) players the annual cost of the WICB proposal would be US$712,800 as against US$1,035,000 being proposed by WIPA – a difference of US$322,200 annually, or 45% above the WICB offer.Match Fees
The Match Fee is the amount, over and above the Retainer Contract fee, received by each player selected to play for the West Indies Team in a Test Match or a One Day International.The Board’s proposal for compensation to players by way of Match Fees under a Retainer Contract arrangement is again based on three (3) categories, as follows:
WICB offer TestODIWIPA offer TestODI
Category A+NANA60002500
Category A3600144050002000
Category B3000120040001500
Category C2500100030001200
Based on the above and assuming a squad of sixteen (16) players playing 16 test matches and 27 ODIs, as for example in the year 2003/2004, the annual cost of the WICB proposal would be US$1.3 million as against US$1.7 million being proposed by WIPA- a difference of US$0.4 million annually and 32.5% above the WICB offer.Appearance Fees
Unlike the arrangement with its previous sponsors which covered only the Home Series Sponsorship engaged in annually by the West Indies Cricket team, the Board has negotiated a sponsorship with Digicel to cover both Home and Away Series engaged in by the West Indies Cricket Team and the West Indies “A” Team.The average net sponsorship amount of US$3.4 million to be received by the West Indies Cricket Board annually over the five years of the agreement is used to assist in defraying the cost of hosting the annual Home Series, including match fees paid to the Team, travel and match fee costs for the West Indies team when on tour, the cost of the Regional Four Day and One Day Tournaments and other programmes for the development of West Indies cricket.In addition, the sponsorship provides up to US$1.7 million annually in incentives for the West Indies Team to be earned on performance. This is a change from the previous sponsorship where 54% of the US$ 725,000 in incentives provided by the sponsor were guaranteed and paid in exchange for exposure of the sponsor’s brand on and off the field of play.Moreover, in the recently completed VB Series, the Board agreed to make a payment of US$200,000 from its own resources so as to permit that tour to proceed. It was clearly understood at the time that the parties would work towards negotiating a formula on the basis of which Appearance Fees would be paid over the period of the Digicel contract rather than by individual tours as happened in the case of the Australian VB series.The Board has proposed that 17% of the net average annual sponsorship value, or US$573,750 per annum, be allocated for distribution to Player Appearance fees.The West Indies Players’ Association has countered with a proposal that US$960,000 or 28% of the Board’s net average annual sponsorship value, should be allocated to Players’ Appearance Fees.In summarising the above positions, assuming a squad of 16 players playing 16 Test matches and 27 ODIs, as for example in the year 2003/2004, the overall annual cost of the Board’s proposal is US $2.6 million which is 13.7 percent of the Board’s average 3 year revenue over the period 2004/5-2006/7.The cost of WIPA’s proposal is US$3.7 million or 19.7 percent of the Board’s average 3-year revenue over the same period. In dollar figures this represents an additional expenditure commitment of US$1.1 million annually which the Board cannot afford.When the full earning capacity of the players is taken into consideration, a player’s potential annual earnings under the Board’s proposal would be by far the highest ever enjoyed by players representing the West Indies and would continue to place the players in the top one percent of income earners in the Caribbean.For the purposes of example only, comparison of the top categories proposed by the Board and WIPA (Category A and Category A+ respectively) , based on playing 16 Test matches and 27 ODIs in a year as in 2003-4, would produce the following annual compensation:
WICB offerWIPA offer
Retainer79,200135,000
Test57,60096,000
ODI38,800135,000
Appearance35,86060,000
Total211,540426,000
By comparison, a Category C WICB player and a Category C WIPA player, based on similar criteria, would earn:
WICB offerWIPA offer
Retainer26,40035,000
Test40,00048,000
ODI27,00032,400
Appearance35,86060,000
Total129,260175,400
Income to be earned by each player from the performance related incentive of up to US$1.7 million annually has not been included in above analyses.On February 21, 2005, the Board advised the West Indies Players’ Association that the divide between the parties in respect of the financial terms of the Retainer Contract and related matters remained so wide that priority should be given to finalizing by February 25, 2005 the terms for the Digicel 2005 Home Series and to negotiating a formula for the allocation for Player Appearances whilst negotiations on the Retainer Contract related matters continued.To effect this, the Board proposed:
  • That the Match/Tour Contract used in the VB Tour to Australia should be modified to replace the temporary Clause 5, inserted specifically for that tour, with the new Clause 5 on which substantial agreement had been reached by the two parties;
  • That the current, prevailing scale of match/tour fees should apply; and
  • That the formula for payment for player compensation for commercial obligations undertaken during the term of the contract be set at 17% of the net sponsorship fee received from Digicel.
  • On March 2nd 2005, the Board received a response from the West Indies Players’ Association which, while raising some issues with Clause 5 of the Match/ Tour Contract proposed by the Board for the upcoming Digicel 2005 Home Series versus South Africa and Pakistan, was silent on the matter of the Match/Tour Fees and the Appearance Fees.In its letter of February 1, 2005 the Board indicated to WIPA that priority be given to finalizing discussions on the terms of the Match/Tour Contract for the upcoming Home Series by February 18, 2005. In the Board’s letter of February 21, 2005 sent by e-mail to the West Indies Players’ Association on February 22, the Board again asserted that priority should be given to finalizing the terms of the Match/Tour Contract for the upcoming Home Series by February 25, 2005 since the parties remained far apart on the financial terms associated with the Retainer Contract.The Board’s letter of February 21 was followed up by a letter dated February 24, 2005, sent by email on that date, in which the Board amended its letter of February 21 to provide greater clarity as to the Board’s proposal.Taking all the above into consideration as well as the need to finalize contractual arrangements with the South African and Pakistan Cricket Boards by March 14, 2005 for the Digicel Home Series commencing later in March, the Board has made the following decision:
  • The selectors have been instructed to name a squad of 25 to 30 players from whom the squad for the Digicel Home Series commencing in March 2005 is to be selected;
  • Each of the above players named by the Selectors is to be sent an invitation to make himself available for selection to the squad under the terms and conditions of the Match/Tour contract for the Australian VB tour, modified to include a new Clause 5 in place of the temporary Clause 5.Each invited player will be required to respond to the Board’s invitation by Friday 11th March, 2005.
  • The West Indies Players’ Association is to be informed of the Board’s decision.
  • Let me now move on to the matter of the issues surrounding the delivery of the Board’s commitments to its major sponsor, Digicel, under its Master Sponsorship Agreement executed in July 2004.The Master Sponsorship Agreement with Digicel represents, by far, the largest sponsorship deal ever contracted by the West Indies Cricket Board.Apart from Team and Title Sponsorship for the West Indies Team on a home and away basis, the agreement covers sponsorship of the West Indies “A” Team and commits, subject to contract, to support the development of the game of cricket in the West Indies, by way of an additional US$1.0 million over the period of the contract.But, before commenting specifically on the issues surrounding the Digicel Master Sponsorship, it is necessary for me to give a timeline of certain events that occurred in 2003 and early 2004 in relation to the negotiation of the renewal of the Home Series sponsorship contract with Cable & Wireless .
  • In July 2003, WICB and Cable & Wireless commenced discussions re renewal of sponsorship.
  • In September 2003, WICB and Cable & Wireless reached agreement on terms of a new 3-year sponsorship, subject to contract and subject to approval of WICB Board.
  • In November 2003 Cable & Wireless produced a draft contract which was rejected by WICB since conditions not discussed or agreed during negotiations had been included.
  • In December 2003, WICB invoked its rights under the contract to enter into negotiations with third parties.
  • On March 1, 2004, WICB, having obtained an offer of alternative sponsorship, and in compliance with the Cable & Wireless sponsorship contract, called on Cable & Wireless to exercise its first option rights and take up the sponsorship on the same terms as the third party offer.
  • On March 2, 2004 Cable &Wireless requested the name of the third party sponsor which WICB declined to supply. At same time, WICB granted Cable & Wireless an extension of time to make a decision to match the offer made by the third party.
  • On March 16, 2004, Cable & Wireless formally declined to exercise its first option rights.
  • In May 2004, during the 2004 Home Series, the Board became aware that some of its players had either signed or were in the process of signing endorsement contracts with Cable and Wireless. The Board met with the players and advised them that Cable & Wireless had opted not to renew its sponsorship of the Home Series and the West Indies team after declining to match an alternative offer received by the Board. The players were advised that negotiations were at a critical stage with a competing sponsor within the telecommunications sector and that the signing of an agreement was imminent.On the same day of the Board’s meeting with the players, the Board received official communication from Cable & Wireless that they had entered into personal endorsements with Omari Banks, Dwayne Smith, Dwayne Bravo, Fidel Edwards and Ravi Rampaul.On August 1 of 2004, the Board wrote to Dwayne Smith, Dwayne Bravo, Fidel Edwards and Ravi Rampaul and also to Chris Gayle and Ramnarace Sarwan, who were reported to have been also contracted, and requested sight of these contracts, minus financial information. The Board also wrote to Brian Lara who had announced the renewal of an endorsement contract with Cable & Wireless during the West Indies Tour to England and requested that he furnish a copy of his contract, minus financial information, for examination.The Board’s purpose in so doing was to seek to ensure that the contracts did not impose on the players any obligations which could cause them or the WICB to be in breach of the sponsorship contract which had been executed between the WICB and Digicel. This against the background of a clause, Clause 1 (k), in the Board’s Match/Tour Contract, which in the Board’s view, required any player under contract to the WICB to pass to the WICB for review any personal endorsement contracts the contracted player was contemplating entering into.The players, through the West Indies Players’ Association, declined to provide the contracts for inspection.In November 2004, the West Indies Cricket Board and the West Indies Players’ Association met in Grenada with the CARICOM Sub-Committee on Cricket at the invitation of the Prime Minister of Grenada, in an attempt to resolve issues that had emerged and that were threatening the upcoming tour by the West Indies to Australia.The Prime Ministerial Sub Committee, in consultation with WICB and WIPA, agreed that WICB and WIPA would submit briefs by Friday 3rd December for the development of Terms of Reference for engagement of an independent adjudicator to be appointed by the Prime Ministerial Sub Committee to render a binding decision on the interpretation of Clause 1K of previous WICB Match/Tour contracts. Both parties were instructed to use their best efforts to make available to the adjudicator all relevant contracts.In December of 2004, the Adjudicator appointed by the CARICOM Sub-Committee on Cricket issued a ruling that a personal endorsement contract entered into by a player could be viewed as legitimately done if this contract were entered into by the player in his individual capacity, that is not as a member of the West Indies Team.The WICB accepted this ruling.The Board however clearly indicated that since the endorsement contracts had not been submitted to the Adjudicator for inspection, there were a number of issues still unresolved and that it had agreed to the terms and conditions outlined for the tour to Australia for the VB Series on the basis that some of the terms and conditions were applicable only for that tour.High among the Board’s concerns, in order that it not commit an involuntary breach of its sponsorship agreement with Digicel, was that there be a determination whether the personal endorsement contracts entered into by seven West Indies players with Cable and Wireless were unquestionably in the nature of individual contracts and contained no provisions which could be construed as passing off by the player of his connection with the West Indies team by attribution or by defining himself as a member of the team.The Board again requested of the Chairman of the CARICOM Sub Committee on Cricket that the contracts in question be submitted for review by the Adjudicator to establish whether they were indeed entered into in the player’s individual capacity or relied on the player’s membership of the West Indies Team. Again, the Board’s purpose in so doing was to seek to ensure that the contracts did not impose on the players any obligations which could cause them or the WICB to be in breach of the sponsorship contract which had being executed between the WICB and DigicelTo the best of the Board’s knowledge, neither the players nor Cable and Wireless have submitted the contracts in question for review.While this matter was being addressed and in what it felt to be the best interests of West Indies Cricket, the WICB agreed to proceed on the VB Series Tour to Australia with one further caveat. It requested of Prime Minister Mitchell, Chairman of CARICOM’s Sub-Committee of Cricket, that he intervene with Cable and Wireless to gain assurance that in the absence of sight of the players’ contracts with Cable & Wireless, nothing would be done by Cable & Wireless to jeopardise the sponsorship deal which the Board had entered into with Digicel.The Prime Minister indicated to the Board that in his discussion with Cable & Wireless, he had been “assured that Cable & Wireless would do nothing in the future to display any advertisement, both in the electronic and print form, to give the impression that any relationship between itself and any of the players (both individually and collectively) is in their capacity as members of the West Indies Cricket team”.In the event, as is clear to the Caribbean public, every opportunity has been taken to use the images of the Cable and Wireless contracted players in ways which trade on their membership of the West Indies Team, refer to them as members of a team and make many references to West Indies Cricket.These occurrences have placed the WICB in a position which compromises its ability to deliver on its commitments to Digicel. It should be noted that the Digicel sponsorship not only benefits those players who are fortunate enough to gain selection to the West Indies team but in fact contributes to every level of West Indies Cricket.The Board cannot allow the whole structure of West Indies cricket to be put in peril as a result of individual contracts which will profit a few players on the West Indies team as opposed to bringing benefit to the entire West Indies cricket family.Therefore, in a situation where the players concerned have repeatedly refused to share with the WICB the non-financial provisions of their contract with Cable and Wireless and where the continued exploitation of these players images may cause the WICB to be in breach of its obligations to its sponsor, the Board has been left with no alternative but to agree to the following course of action:1.Not to consider for selection to the West Indies Cricket Team the players who have personal endorsement contracts with Cable & Wireless – Bravo, Edwards, Gayle, Lara, Rampaul, Sarwan and Dwayne Smith – until such time as the Board can be satisfied that these contracts are unquestionably in the nature of individual contracts and contain no provisions which could be construed as passing off by the player of his connection with the West Indies Team by attribution or by defining himself as a member of the team;2.To write to each of the above players to notify them of the Boards decision; and3.To inform the West Indies Players’ Association of the Boards decision, simultaneously.The Board expects the players named by the Selectors to respond to its invitation to make themselves available for the Digicel 2005 Home Series by Friday March 11th so that the Board may decide by March 14 whether the tour is to proceed.The world of sport today is inextricably linked with commercial interests. It is fair to say that without significant support from sponsors, the West Indies, or any cricketing nation for that matter will find it almost impossible to fulfil its obligations or to field a competitive team.The Digicel sponsorship agreement has given the Board the opportunity to substantially fund the development of cricket generally, which is its mandate. For the first time sponsorship of this nature goes beyond the international team and channels right through to the level of youth cricket, assisting the needed preparation of a future generation of cricketers..The Board is committed to develop West Indies cricket for the benefit of the fans and all players throughout the region and accepts its responsibility to take West Indies Cricket to the next level while preserving the integrity of the relationships necessary to secure a long- term prosperous future for all, at all levels of the game.Two of the more exciting teams in world cricket, South Africa and Pakistan, come to our shores at the end of this month to take part in the Digicel 2005 Home Series. The Board looks forward to the support of all friends of West Indies Cricket as we continue to prepare for our biggest assignment yet – the Cricket World Cup 2007.