Man Utd transfer news on Todibo

Manchester United are reportedly now eyeing up a move for Nice central defender Jean-Clair Todibo this window.

The Lowdown: Alongside Martinez?

Ajax centre-back Lisandro Martinez has been strongly linked with a move to Old Trafford to link up again with his former manager Erik ten Hag.

They could look to bring in two new centre-halves with Todibo as well, or sign the Frenchman as a potential alternative to Martinez, with Arsenal also firmly in the race for his signature.

The Latest: On shortlist

Taking to Twitter, Foot Mercato journalist Sebastien Denis has revealed that Todibo is on the ‘short list’ for the Red Devils as well as Newcastle United, and is estimated to cost more than €20m (£17m):

“Info: FC Sevilla and Naples have approached Nice for Jean-Clair Todibo. But the Gym said no. The French defender, estimated at more than 20 M € , is on the short list of Manchester United and Newcastle and things could change for him this summer.”

The Verdict: Get it done

Whether MUFC sign Martinez or not, this is a deal that they need to get done before the season starts. Both Eric Bailly and Phil Jones have reportedly told their teammates of their plan to leave this summer, so Ten Hag will need extra cover in the heart of the defence.

[web_stories_embed url=”https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/web-stories/latest-man-utd-news-4/” title=”Latest Man Utd news!” poster=”” width=”360″ height=”600″ align=”none”]

Todibo, branded as ‘quick’ by fellow Nice teammate Amine Gouiri despite his six-foot-three colossal stature, has played at a high level for the likes of FC Barcelona as well as his current club, and is still only 22 years of age.

He comes off the back of a solid campaign for Nice, helping them qualify for Europe with a fifth-placed finish in Ligue 1, with some memorable performances like in the 0-0 draw away at champions PSG, where he was highly praised for frustrating world superstars Lionel Messi and Kylian Mbappe.

Nonetheless, if United can get both Todibo and Martinez through the door, it could represent a great piece of business.

Everton could land Oleksandr Zinchenko

Frank Lampard looks like he has been given the green light to sign Oleksandr Zinchenko for Everton this summer following an apparent recent admission from the Manchester City player.

What’s the word?

According to 90min, the 25-year-old is open to leaving the Etihad Stadium this summer, although any club aiming to sign him would need to promise him game-time in a midfield role.

According to The Athletic, the Ukrainian was offered to the Toffees last week as Lampard looks to refresh his squad this summer.

Having excelled at left-back during his time in Manchester, it is believed that Zinchenko wants to play in a midfield role going forward and this has plunged his future in doubt, with Everton looking to make a move.

Lampard could bolster his squad with Zinchenko move

Following Everton’s recent relegation dogfight in the Premier League, which saw them survive by the skin of their teeth, Lampard will be looking to refresh the squad that he inherited from Rafa Benitez.

Having conceded 66 goals last season in the top flight, there is no doubt where the priority ought to lie, although the addition of greater quality to the midfield should also be considered.

Zinchenko could add that extra bit of quality in the engine room at Goodison Park, and with the player being valued at £25m, the fee shouldn’t be a problem for Lampard. His Sofascore rating of 7.07 from the 2021/22 season was not only better than any Everton midfielder, but exceeded every single player in the Toffees’ squad, so it definitely seems like he would be an upgrade on what the 43-year-old already has.

He was dubbed “frightening” by Gregg Evans during City’s comeback win over Aston Villa last month which secured them the league title.

The 25-year-old excels in the centre of midfield for Ukraine, displaying his qualities with a fantastic performance against Scotland in the recent World Cup play-off semi-final victory. As per Sofascore, he was the highest-ranked player on the pitch with a rating of 8.0 as he made three key passes, had 86 touches and dictated the match in Ukraine’s favour.

At left-back for Man City this season, Zinchenko ranks in the top 1% compared to positional peers in the big five European leagues in both progressive passes (8.02 per 90) and progressive carries (9.3). These statistics suggest that he is at his best when moving forward and starting attacks.

Lampard could offer him this sought-after midfield role at Everton, and with the 25-year-old’s recent performances, especially for Ukraine, he would be an excellent signing for the Toffees.

AND in other news, Lampard must now brutally axe Everton’s £22m “walking red card”, he’s Klaassen 2.0

Man Utd nearing move for Ruben Neves

Manchester United appear to be are closing in on a deal to sign Ruben Neves, with the club ready to make a final push to get the move done.

What’s the word?

The Daily Mail have reported that Erik ten Hag is a big fan of the Portuguese midfielder, with the Red Devils keen to make one last big push to sign the 25-year-old.

Neves has been on United’s radar for the previous 12 months, with Wolves wanting a fee of around £50m in order to let one of their main assets leave Molineux.

[snack-amp-story url= “https://www.footballfancast.com/web-stories/read-the-latest-man-united-news-transfer-rumours-gossip-and-more-nunez-ten-hag-nkunku-richarlison” title=”Read the latest Man United news!”]

He’s the next Paul Scholes

Incoming manager Ten Hag will need to organise a major rebuild of the United squad this summer, with the midfield being a key area to prioritise.

With the future of Paul Pogba still up in the air, Nemanja Matic leaving and other members of the side simply not good enough, Neves would be the ideal signing for the Red Devils.

Journalist Tim Spiers has dubbed the 25-year-old “sensational”, while former United player Paul Parker compared Neves to Paul Scholes, drawing similarities between the two in terms of how the Portugal international strikes the ball.

Only two players (both forwards) scored more league goals for Wolves this season, while only Raul Jimenez had a greater shots per game average than Neves’ 1.3 (as per WhoScored). Also, the 25-year-old made the third-most tackles and interceptions in Bruno Lage’s squad (as per FBRef), showing an industriousness to complement his impact going forward.

With Neves’ talents and ability to be an asset both going forward and defensively, the Scholes comparisons are spot-on. If United do sign the 25-year-old, they would get the player as he is heading into what will likely be his peak years, and £50m sounds like a bargain when the positives are examined more in-depth.

His versatility will be a major advantage for Ten Hag going forward, with Neves being adept at playing either in a defensive midfield position or slightly further forward. Four goals and two assists is also a solid return in a Wolves side which only netted 38 times in as many league matches.

These figures will surely improve if he makes the move to Old Trafford, with a better quality of player around him and having the likes of Cristiano Ronaldo on the end of his passes, so it could be a fruitful move for all parties if it does come off.

AND in other news, Bid incoming: Sky Sports journalist drops MUFC transfer update, Ten Hag will be thrilled

Rangers: Dean Jones drops worrying claim

A worrying Rangers transfer claim has emerged ahead of the upcoming summer transfer window…

What’s the talk?

Transfer insider Dean Jones has suggested that several Gers players could be looking for a way out of Glasgow at the end of the season.

He told GIVEMESPORT: “I think for younger players in that Rangers squad, this is going to be extremely exciting.

“For the more experienced ones, a lot of them are at a key point in their career when they are still going to have to consider a transfer this summer.”

Van Bronckhorst will be deflated

Light Blues head coach Gio van Bronckhorst will surely be deflated by the prospect of a number of his first-team stalwarts wanting to leave in the summer.

In spite of Celtic securing the Premiership title earlier this week, Rangers are on a high and have the chance to end the campaign with two trophies to show for their efforts. They play Eintracht Frankfurt in the Europa League final next week before facing Hearts in the Scottish Cup final later in the month.

It is an exciting time to play for, support or manage the Gers with these huge matches to come in the next few weeks, but that excitement and joy (if they win) will soon fade if several key players start to head for the exit door.

Jones believes that some of the more experienced heads may want to move on at this point in their careers, and leaving after a major European final would be the ideal send-off from their perspective. However, Van Bronckhorst will still be frustrated at the thought of losing the likes of Connor Goldson and Ryan Kent.

The former is out of contract in the summer and it remains to be seen whether or not he will want to extend his terms, whilst the latter has been linked with a host of Premier League clubs.

Both players have averaged SofaScore ratings of 7.06 or higher in the Premiership this season and have been putting in consistently brilliant displays throughout the campaign. This illustrates how important they have been for the Light Blues, as they have been mainstays in the team.

Therefore, Van Bronckhorst will be feeling deflated at the thought of both of them leaving the club in the summer, as they would leave huge holes for Ross Wilson to fill if they depart.

AND in other news, Wilson heading for big Rangers disaster on “ridiculous” £6.4k-p/w tank, GvB needs him…

'This much I know: how to play in what situation'

India’s always-attacking, ever-smiling Test wicketkeeper passed a baptism by fire in Australia and England last year. He talks about his keeping, and the method behind his batting madness

Interview by Sidharth Monga19-Feb-2019Rishabh Pant has had the toughest possible initiation into international cricket. Nine months ago he was looking at an idle summer. Then Wriddhiman Saha got injured and Pant was thrown into the deep end before his time. His first consistent run has come in Tests: it came in Tests in England, the toughest place to keep wicket to quicks, and during a series that was very tough for batting. He has set records for byes, and also for dismissals. He has looked suspect at times, but he has scored hundreds in London and Sydney. He has been consistently in the spotlight, but he has taken the challenge on with a smile on his face.What were your plans for the last summer?
Nothing special. I was in England playing for India A in the one-day matches. There the selectors put it in the back of my mind that I could get a call-up for the Tests. Wriddhi [Saha] was injured, so they asked me to stay prepared and selected me for the four-day matches too.When did you get to know you were selected?
It was the morning of our four-day match against England Lions. It was almost their main team. Alastair Cook, Chris Woakes, Sam Curran, Ollie Pope, Dawid Malan, they were all there. We were about to go out on the field – we had lost the toss and were fielding first. Just then Nannu [Sarandeep Singh, national selector] called me over. “Rishabh, come here for a minute.” I went there. And he said, “You are selected.” I said, “For what?” surety .” [I wanted to be sure before I let myself enjoy it.]He said, your name is in the Test team. Oh time [Oh the joy I felt at that time…] The first thing I did was hug Nannu . Then I went to keep wicket, and what joy I kept wicket with that day.After the day’s play, the moment I got my phone back, the first thing I did was call my mother. She was very happy. Then I called Tarak sir [Tarak Sinha, Pant’s coach in Delhi].Your game is modern. It is aggressive, but the way you speak about it, it seems Test cricket means everything to you.
Always. Right from the start. Because at Sonnet Club [where Sinha coaches], merely an international player means nothing. He often says, “International player is nothing. Test player is the real player.” It always stayed in my mind. I had played for India one year previously. But Tarak sir was like, “That’s okay, that’s no big deal. The day you play Test cricket, I will recognise you as a proper player.” That’s why after my mother, I called him up.1:52

The Paine-Pant banter series

What did he say that day?
After a long time, he was happy that day. Generally he is very hard to please. Even if I score a hundred, he is never pleased. That was the day he was happy.England is the most difficult place to keep wicket, and the quality of the bowlers was so high. Did you feel it was a big jump?
No. You face all these bowlers in the IPL. Domestic cricket has these same bowlers. Just that the ball moves a lot more in England. But that’s okay, there’s always a first time. But I can say that as a wicketkeeper, when I played India A matches and then against the Lions, I had a fair idea of what to expect. Also, these matches were played with the Dukes ball. And it is India A bowlers who go and bowl in Tests in the future. Unless you are a good bowler, you won’t be in the India A side.A lot of byes were conceded at the start. The odd catch went down. Did you ever feel you should have been eased in through the shorter formats and then progressed to Tests?
No. I didn’t feel that, because if you see those byes, you will know whether 90% of those should be called byes or whatever…Or wides…
Yes. People who saw the game live, England wicketkeeping coach Bruce French and Jos Buttler, both of them said they had never seen anyone keeping in England for the first time do so well. Yes, I conceded byes. Obviously it frustrated me. But if I am doing my best and I can’t stop them, if the bowler himself is coming to apologise – I am conceding boundaries and he is saying sorry – then you feel…Okay, I am not running away from it, I did miss the odd one here or there, but most of them were difficult to stop.ALSO READ: Innate confidence helps Pant face tough initiationThe number of byes was going up but so were the number of catches and stumpings. Test cricket is a long day – six and a half hours of keeping, the big screen is playing the byes often. How difficult is it to stay positive and not let it affect you?
That’s the most difficult part. Especially in those conditions, and in your debut series. That pressure builds up in its own way, but as a wicketkeeper you must know this will go on. There will be byes, there will be catches that will go down, but what is important is what you do when the next chance arrives. Because there will always be a next catch. If you are not positive, if you are not in a good frame of mind, you can drop that next one too. To recover from your mistake, you have to stay positive. How you do it – as a player you should know that.How did you learn to do that?
I always look at the positive side of things. Wicketkeeping is all about the feel. And I got a good feel about my wicketkeeping in England. So I didn’t look too much at the scoreboard.And the big screen? Did you see highlights packages on the big screen of all the byes?
Yes, but what I saw was this: I was taking two-three steps, and then diving full length. If the ball goes away even after that, I wasn’t that unhappy about it.So even at that time you were analysing yourself?
As a wicketkeeper, and as a youngster, if I don’t learn, it will be very difficult. Always important to keep learning from your mistakes. I was analysing which balls I could have stopped, which I couldn’t have.

Every observer, great former players, they were all impressed with your positivity. That you still enjoyed yourself, the way you used to get up, the kip-up…
All that comes natural to me.Nothing to do with Shawn Michaels or professional wrestling?
There was never time to watch wrestling. Just watched cricket and played cricket. I did gymnastics for two-three years. This comes from there.Did you do any technical work on your keeping after the England tour?
It is all natural. You have to keep improving, yes. Make little adjustments – where you stand, position of hands – but I didn’t have to make any big changes.Tell us more about your first runs in Test cricket.
I was nervous when I went out to bat. I was reminding myself to play according to the ball. I defended the first ball, but I saw what he [Adil Rashid] was trying to do. The second ball was a googly, and we Indian batsmen are good at reading spin. I read it from the hand, I felt like I could hit it, and I hit it.ALSO READ: How do you solve India’s ODI middle order conundrum?There was this expectation long ago that you were going to be the X-factor in the Test side, but then there were some whispers about the way you were getting out. But you know your game the best, right? What is risk for someone else might not be risk for you. Did you have to fight that conception? Did you ever have to hear that you are irresponsible, that your attitude is not great?
Formats make all the difference. If you are playing days cricket and get out trying to hit a six, everybody knows and says it is irresponsible. But when it comes off, nobody says anything. The percentage is what matters. If you are getting out in ten matches but are getting the results in nine of them, that is important. If my percentage of results is high, I only focus on my process. And if something is working for me, it might not work for someone else. Similarly if something is working for someone else, it might not always help me.And you are not playing these outrageous shots straight in matches. You have practised them.
Everything. Right from childhood. It feels like all my life I have played only cricket. By now, at least this much I know: how to play in what situation. Sometimes you have to curb your instincts, that is also important. At the end of the day, you have to score runs. Can’t play just to survive.And you bat a lot with the tail.
Yes, and at that time you have two options: I can come back not out or I can go for the team goals. Everybody likes personal glory to an extent but team goals are always more important.”I was taking two-three steps, and then diving full length. If the ball goes away even after that, I wasn’t that unhappy about it”•Getty ImagesYou said you need to curb your instincts at times. Can you give examples of when you might have done so in Test cricket?
During that hundred in England [at The Oval], we were too far behind. You had to be careful to pick what balls you hit. In England, if you give yourself some time, you can score runs. So I was very selective at the start of the innings. Once I got used to the conditions, the runs came.But once you got close to the end, and you had a break to think about the situation, what was the thinking in the final session?
In the final session we were just thinking about how we can chase the total down. When I and Rahul [KL Rahul] were batting, we were positive. The game plan was to play normal cricket, but then he got out, and then I got out…When he got out, did you feel maybe you should try to save the Test?
Right now in this Indian team, we only play to win. Whatever the match, whatever the situation, every player, from No. 1 to 11, only thinks about how he can win the match for India. That is the most important thing for us. That we have to win it for India.What did Virat Kohli say to you before that fifth day?
He said it is not compulsory that you attain experience after 100 Tests. Even in your second Test, you can do what nobody has ever done.ALSO READ: Pant roars into record books with second Test tonIn Australia, your commentary from behind the wicket was a side track by itself. Were you aware that was happening and were you ever circumspect that you might be caught saying something that could land you in trouble?
Yeah, I was aware, but there is no way I could land in trouble. I never abused anybody. It was normal, hard, competitive Test cricket. You keep saying those things because you want to play with the batsman’s concentration. It was good banter. Personally I never felt that I crossed any line.Was the “banter” from Australia as good-natured as everybody thought it was?
See, we don’t go there to make the other team win the match. If you want to win it for your team, then [do] whatever it takes. They were also doing the same. Whoever executes the plans better wins.And you have the experience to know what to say and where the line is being crossed.
Yes. I behave the way I usually do. There is no chance I will cross the line because I have never done so.

What do you feel about stump mics, though? Do you feel keeping them up all the time intrudes into your personal space, and in a way, it is setting cricketers up to fail?
I am no one to decide. But what I will say is, you won’t see this much banter all the time. There is time in Test cricket. You won’t see it this much in ODIs and T20s. This is good competition. Good competition is important for Test cricket. But I can’t say whether stump mics should be kept up or not.You don’t feel your personal workspace is being intruded?
I don’t see it that way. The match is on. Even if the mic is off, you can lip-read what is being said. I don’t feel the stump mics make that much of a difference.Where has your batting gone in your time in Test cricket?
I just focus on my processes. I don’t see whether I am doing well or badly. Because results obviously matter, but at the end of the day, your processes are important. Whatever processes have brought me here, I need to focus on that. On my work ethic, on how much time I devote to wicketkeeping process, what I need to do before matches.What has been the most satisfying part of your time in Test cricket?
That my processes are working. That I can trust my game.Coming to this IPL – Delhi has invested trust in you. How do you see this Delhi Capitals team shaping up?
There have been quite a few changes. The support staff has changed, players have changed, the name has changed. I feel we can do something different this time. At the start of the season we are only focusing on how we can win the trophy.You have a good core of youngsters in your side: you, Shreyas Iyer, Prithvi Shaw… Now there is added experience of someone like Shikhar Dhawan.
The balance is quite good. Shikhi is there, Ishant [Sharma] is there. We have got Colin Ingram. The mix of youth and experience will help.

Lights, cameras, guns, action

A former cricketer who was part of an ICC delegation sent to assess the security on offer at the PSL final reports

Mike Selvey15-Mar-2017It is 0200 hours on the morning of Sunday, March 5. The night is crystal clear with a slight chill in the air after the heat of the day, and I am standing on the tarmac outside the VVIP reception terminal in a remote corner of Lahore’s Allama Iqbal International airport. Behind me are maybe a couple of dozen armed Pakistan commandos and elite police. Five snipers are perched on the roof of the single-story building. To one side are four military helicopters, while ahead stretches the airport runway towards the main terminal, where the tailfin of Emirates flight EK622, newly landed from Dubai, stands out. A vehicle convoy, headlights blazing and red-and-blue lights flashing, has left the environs of the aircraft and is making its way rapidly towards us.It pulls up by us, police vehicles topping and tailing the line. Sandwiched in between are two 16-seater Toyota Coaster buses, armoured to a B6 ballistics rating, and so designed to withstand bullets from assault rifles such as the commonly used AK47. There is also protection underneath from landmine-type blasts. Faces peer through the windows. The Peshawar Zalmi cricket team has arrived in the city to contest with Quetta Gladiators the final of the Pakistan Super League T20 competition.The small convoy, joined now by the armoured bus I am in, makes its way through three security gates, plain-clothes close-protection officers running alongside. Beyond, a maelstrom of flashing lights and military presence, is the convoy that will take the team to the Pearl Continental hotel. We move forward, and are surrounded by the main body of the cavalcade that will deliver the team. In the last 24 hours, the route we will take has been swept for explosives and a practice run made.A full house attended the match despite the rigorous security checks and the tighter arrangements for ticket purchasing•Associated PressThe whole route, one of two alternatives and chosen at the last minute, has been lit with temporary floodlights every 100 metres. Officers likewise are staged every 100 metres and police vehicles every 200. Each kilometre sees a pair of motorcyclists, members of the new 670-strong “Dolphin” rapid-response teams, linked to a control centre by mobile cameras and GPS, and with the capability to upload and download visual information. Housing alongside the route has been swept and occupants vetted. Intermittent rooftops have snipers installed. Hospitals are on alert and safe houses have been readied. A helicopter throbs above, with others on standby for evacuation if necessary. All intersections are sealed off to a distance of 200 metres from the route and any cars not driven away voluntarily have been removed by forklift truck (as they will be from the environs of the Gaddafi stadium): the route is entirely free of traffic and scanned by perhaps the most advanced CCTV system in the world.A cavalcade of 21 vehicles forms with the two team buses at the centre. In the vanguard is a motorcycle traffic “pilot” and behind him two traffic vehicles, each containing a high-ranking traffic officer. The buses are surrounded on either side and in front by seven vehicles containing elite heavily armed troops, the one in front armed with a light machine gun. Behind the rear bus comes an ambulance and a fire truck, and to either side of these, a vehicle that can jam signals and another containing the senior officer in charge of the operation. Two more elite vehicles and a rear traffic pilot complete the main cavalcade, while two more elite vehicles will run parallel to it down the other side of the dual carriageway that will be employed.We move off, at high speed. The journey from the airport to the PC hotel generally can take up to an hour, such is the traffic. Here it takes precisely six minutes to reach Gate 3 of the hotel, which opens. The close-protection officers decant from their vehicles and take up their positions alongside the buses and escort them into the hotel grounds, where the team steps down from their bus and into the hotel lobby.Paramilitary soldiers armed and armoured stand outside the stadium•AFPThe hotel itself has been secured. Individual guests have been vetted for the duration of the team’s stay. All booked functions have been postponed. Armed police are everywhere, and plain-clothes special-branch officers are by the lifts and occupy positions on the dedicated floors. No one can move around without protection at hand. It is close to 3am by the time the team get to bed, with a game starting in 17 hours.I am in Lahore at the invitation of the Pakistan Cricket Board as part of an ICC security delegation, which includes representatives from Australia, the UK, South Africa, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and the ICC itself. My brief from the ICC was to spend some time beforehand talking to the various experts with a stake in the very high level of security that was being put into place, and at the end of it all, make an honest and independent personal assessment on how I, placing myself in the shoes of an overseas cricketer, felt during that time. Did I feel secure in the knowledge that the security provided was intended to be, and was, of the highest standard, or despite this, did I still feel uneasy, particularly given the recent terrorist attacks in Pakistan and Lahore in particular? I was being paid for my time but not, I insisted as a condition, to write an ICC or PCB public-relations piece. I was fully aware of the proposal for a series of matches between Pakistan and a World XI to be played in Lahore in September 2017, and knew that the successful staging of the PSL final, with the security road-tested, was an integral part of the plan. I had travelled to Lahore with assurances but still less detailed security information than the two finalists had been given.It is the afternoon prior to the team’s arrival and we are at the Punjab Police Integrated Command, Control and Communication centre (PPIC3), a white block building set in a compound in central Lahore. The manner in which Punjab is policed has been redrawn in the wake of the attack on the Sri Lankan team in 2009, and restructured in the past 12 months into the Safe Cities Authority, which includes, among other functions, integrated emergency response and counter-terrorism. Incidents of terrorism, we are told, have declined dramatically since the inception of this body, from 43 in 2012 down to seven last year.Darren Sammy dances and entertains the crowd before the final, which his team, Peshawar Zalmi, won•Associated PressWe are in a wood-panelled first-floor conference room, and through plate glass see below a vast space with perhaps 50 or 60 screens on the wall, each monitored 24/7 by pods of specially trained IT graduates. This, we are told, is considered the most advanced and comprehensive CCTV coverage of a city in the world, the installation of which was overseen by the Metropolitan Police of London. Fifteen-thousand cameras monitor Lahore, 8000 of which are fixed at 1800 sensitive locations across the city, and the remainder mobile, including those assigned to the Dolphin teams. Fifteen-hundred kilometres of optical fibre were installed. The whole thing cost US$137 million. The capability and clarity are hugely impressive.It is around the conference table that the protocols for the final are explained. The Gaddafi Stadium lies within Nishtar Park, a sporting complex containing hockey, swimming and football stadiums, as well as the cricket ground. The whole complex has already been secured and is being swept by dogs and detectors. Within the hockey stadium there is a dedicated control centre with its own bank of screens monitoring 81 on-site cameras (59 fixed and 22 with pan, tilt, and zoom capacity). There are two 20-bed temporary hospitals set up in the complex and two mobile hospitals. Contingency is in place for aerial evacuation of the teams.The stadium is expected to be full to its 22,000 capacity. Tickets for the event have been sold through special outlets such as banks, with biometric identification required, and identities verified through the National Database and Registration Authority. The biometrics will be used again when spectators enter checkpoints in each of the four concentric zones with the stadium at the centre. There will be body searches and scans at each stage. Within the crowd, plain-clothed police and special-branch officers will mingle.For the journey from the hotel to the stadium, the same cavalcade will form and again take one of two routes. Two hundred and twenty-seven cameras have been installed at 71 sites to monitor progress. The journey, as with that from the airport, will take around six minutes.Now, though, we have some confusion. The team have been told that there will be a 4.30pm departure (three and a half hours before the match, although there is a closing ceremony first), while our delegation, due to travel in the same convoy, has been told it is half an hour later. The difference is split, but outside, in the hotel forecourt, it becomes chaotic. The players are installed in the buses, but a tidal wave of team owners and sponsors with their families and guests also disgorges from the hotel. Buses are boarded and disembarked again. There are too few places for everyone. At one point, some of the Pakistani players in the teams are placed in an unarmoured bus, which is far from satisfactory; the overseas players were unaffected and perhaps oblivious. It takes 20 minutes to sort it all out, all within the confines of the hotel grounds, but that, and the melee inside the hotel as the teams leave, will need rectifying in future. The cavalcade to the ground is rapid and uneventful.Fans express their delight at the return of high-profile cricket to Pakistan•AFPInside the stadium, the ground is already filling fast when the teams arrive, but it is some time, after the entertainment of the closing show, before they take the field and walk a lap to greet the crowd. The perimeter of the playing area is around 20 metres from the fencing in front of the stands, but there were perhaps a hundred people within that area: performers, VIP guests and families for the most part. At one point some players were surrounded by well-wishers and selfie-seekers, attention they might have done without. The sterile Players, Management and Officials zone that embraces the dressing rooms seems less secure than it ought.Perhaps this is nit-picking but that, as my fellow delegates are quick to point out, is what they are here to do: be mindful of the weakest link. The vetting procedure has been immense and the level of protection within the hotel and on the roads staggering. The chaos on the hotel forecourt can easily be addressed, and likewise the limited intrusion at the ground.Throughout, I was afforded the same level of security as the teams (a visit I made on my own to the stadium the day after the match saw my car preceded by an outrider and flanked by two vehicles of elite forces). I felt completely comfortable in regard to my own safety. I subsequently was told that in any case, intelligence service intercepts had discovered that the intense nature of the security had acted as a deterrent, which prior knowledge might also have served to ease the doubts of those who while taking their own safety as a given, were nonetheless concerned about any incidents in the crowd beyond the stadium’s security blanket.The day after the match, Colonel Azam Khan, 20 years an intelligence officer and now the PCB’s head of security, said that overall he was very satisfied. The process had begun ten days previously, he said, and 90% of the objective was to secure not just Lahore but the whole of Punjab. There was still some fine-tuning, he admitted, with “maybe a lack of some coordination at some operational points”. But these too could be readily addressed and not repeated.There will be natural questions. With so many resources concentrated at this event, did it dilute security elsewhere across Lahore and Punjab? How sustainable is such a security exercise in the future?To the first: all major sporting events anywhere in the world require concentration of resources, so Pakistan is no different, but the short answer is that bringing international cricket back to Pakistan will be a slow and lengthy process. This has been a first tentative step in the right direction. The economic benefits of regular international cricket, even as a representation of a more normal society, would far outweigh the security costs. This security is merely a manifestation of the total revamping of policing in Punjab.To the second, the most senior officials from across the province were drafted in for this exercise, but as Colonel Azam suggested, the security of the stadium was only 10% of the objective, with that of the whole of Lahore and the province paramount. In the next few years, resources such as those for Lahore will be rolled out in other cities: Faisalabad, Rawalpindi, Multan, Gujranwala and Bahawalpur.It is my hope to return in September, and, as things stand, I will do so without hesitation or any of the apprehensions I might have had this time. Between now and then, world-class players will be approached and asked if they will participate in what will be a second significant staging post on the way to bringing regular international cricket back to Pakistan. The success of the PSL final, and the testimony of those overseas players who took part, such as Darren Sammy and Dawid Malan, should go some way to assuaging doubts, and it may be that the advice of the security advisers to the national boards will have softened somewhat.It was a fine occasion, and a small first step, but one that needed to be taken. Pakistan, not just Pakistan cricket, deserves it.

'The best boss I worked for'

Former India coach John Wright remembers his professional relationship with Jagmohan Dalmiya, saying what a ‘tough’ and ‘fair’ boss he was

John Wright22-Sep-2015I am very sorry to hear about Mr Dalmiya’s passing away and as I look back at our time together when I was coach of India, he was probably the best boss I have worked for. He was a tough but fair boss. On the first day that I was in the job with India, Tony Greig said to me that Mr Dalmiya is a very powerful man in Indian cricket and it was ironic because he wasn’t even the president [of BCCI] then. I had been hired by Mr AC Muthiah. The next thing I heard when he came to power in 2001 were rumours that he wanted to sack me and [physiotherapist] Andrew [Leipus]. I met him for the first time when we went to Delhi for a long interview with him, two hours, in a hotel suite.At the end of it, I’ll never forget what he said to me. His exact words were, “I’ve heard a lot of things about you but you’re quite tough. I think we could work together.” He asked me to put a report together about what Indian cricket needed and I spent a lot of time on it. He always wanted you to report personally to him. I had to fly every month to see him and we got to know each other well over the next four years. A lot of people said a lot of things about Mr Dalmiya, but you take everyone for what you see and he was a great boss to work for.I remember early on while working together, we were on a tour of the West Indies. They were 400 something for 3 and Gautam Dasgupta, the manager, handed me the phone and said “it is the president.” We were sitting in the pavilion in Georgetown, Guyana and Mr Dalmiya came on the phone and said, “John, what is going on?” I can’t remember what I said, something like, “We have to do better, Mr President.”In those days I think failure wasn’t tolerated whether you were a captain or coach or even administrator, you needed to win, or things changed very quickly. There weren’t other types of cricket, it was just international cricket and the success of the Indian team was very, very important. Mr Dalmiya was a big part of that era and while he gave both Sourav [Ganguly] and me support, he was a staunch supporter of Sourav but he also wanted the results.The thing I loved about him as a boss was that he never interfered, but you knew very well where you stood with him. He didn’t interfere with me about how to coach, you just had to report and let him know what was going on. He was hands off in that respect and we gained a great friendship and respect for each other. It is why I say he is probably the best boss that I worked for, in terms of not telling you how to do your job, but telling you what was expected.During one of our meetings just before the team left for the 2003 World Cup, he wished me good luck and said, “if you don’t come first or second we might not be meeting again.”When we reached the final, I was re-employed, and to me that was okay, because we used to joke about it. We knew there was a lot at stake, that it was important that the team did well. He cared about the team very much and he cared about Indian cricket. But he was pragmatic enough to know that if things weren’t going well, then something would have to be done and it would probably start with the coach.We had that understanding that it was business and it was important for India and for the Indian cricket team. He understood that performance was important, that is wasn’t just about talking the good game, you had to get the results there. We would joke about it but it was real. He used to say, “well I might have to show you the door,” and I would say, “if things don’t go well, you will have to show me the door.”When I finished with India, he came over from Calcutta to attend a presentation in Delhi and he didn’t usually do that a lot, it was a nice gesture. We kept in touch irregularly over the last few years and I heard about his return to the top of the BCCI again and you would never underestimate him and his political ability in Indian cricketing circles.I had a lot of time for him, I enjoyed working for him because he was tough but he was fair. And he always did what he said.

Du Plessis misses record-breaking century

A stats review at the end of the tri-series final between Australia and South Africa

Bishen Jeswant06-Sep-2014464 Number of runs scored by Faf du Plessis in this series, the most runs scored (max 5 matches) in an ODI triangular or quadrangular tournament. There are only three other batsmen who have scored 400-plus runs in such a tournament – Sachin Tendulkar, Sanath Jayasuriya and Aravinda de Silva. No batsman has scored more than three hundreds in any multi-team ODI tournament, including World Cups – in the final, du Plessis fell four short of a record fourth century.27 Number of innings in which Aaron Finch got to 1000 ODI runs. This is the third fastest by an Australian. The joint Australian record is held by Greg Chappell and George Bailey, both of whom needed only 26 innings to reach that mark. Shaun Marsh and Michael Hussey needed 27, as many as Finch. The overall record is 21 innings, jointly held by Vivian Richards, Kevin Pietersen, Jonathan Trott and Quinton de Kock.71 Number of runs posted by James Faulkner and Mitchell Starc for the ninth wicket today. This is the highest ninth wicket partnership for Australia against South Africa. Also, this is Australia’s fourth highest ninth wicket partnership after losing the first eight wickets for less than 150. Across countries, there have been six century partnerships from this situation, four of those by India, and one each by England and Sri Lanka.220 The lowest score that South Africa have failed to chase in an ODI tournament final. This was in the Titan Cup against India, at Mumbai, in 1996. There have been seven instances of South Africa failing to chase down a total in an ODI tournament, three times against Australia, but South Africa cruised to the 218 run target that they were set today.1 Number of times before today that Wayne Parnell had batted above No. 7 in an ODI. The only exception in his 20 previous ODI innings being a game against New Zealand at Auckland in 2012, when he open the batting and scored 27, during an 80-run opening partnership with Hashim Amla. Today’s experiment was not as successful though, with Parnell only managing to score 6 off 24 balls.0 Number of times while batting first that Australia have scored 250 against South Africa after being five down for less than 150. Today was no different. Australia have been in this situation against South Africa on 10 occasions, and have finished up on less than 200 on five of those instances, with 240 being the highest score that they have posted.12 Number of years since South Africa have won an ODI tournament final. The last ODI tournament that they won was the VB series in 2002, also involving Australia and New Zealand. Since then they have lost two finals, the Morocco Cup to Sri Lanka and NatWest series to England, with the TVS Cup final against India being washed out.

Clarke springs a surprise, twice

ESPNcricinfo presents the Plays of the Day from the second day of the Hobart Test

Daniel Brettig in Hobart15-Dec-2012Surprise of the day
The way Australia’s newspapermen waxed eloquent about Michael Clarke overnight when he was 70 not out, it seemed a century and more was as inevitable as rain in Hobart. This assumption looked a safe one based on Clarke’s stellar 2012, in which he has so far piled up 1432 runs, including three double-centuries and a triple, against India at the SCG in January. But the Bellerive Oval pitch seemed a little zippier and seamer-friendly on the second morning, and in a swift spell Shaminda Eranga extracted enough life to deceive even Clarke, coaxing an edge that was well held at slip. So the expectation of another captain’s century was confounded, at least for today.Drop of the day
For 170 balls, Michael Hussey made barely the ghost of a mistake on his way to 96, maintaining a fearsome record of runs against Sri Lanka. But to the 171st he swivelled to pull Eranga, did not get on top of the bounce, and Angelo Mathews hovered under the chance in the deep. He intercepted it right on the boundary, but spilled the chance, the ball bobbling onto the turf and then over the rope. Hussey celebrated his fifth century in six Tests against Sri Lanka. In the one Test Hussey did not pass three-figures against Sri Lanka, he had made 95.Decision of the day
As the best captains tend to do, Clarke often makes decisions in advance of observers reaching a consensus on what he might do. Hussey and Matthew Wade were having very little trouble at all against Sri Lanka’s bowlers, rolling along at better than five runs per over following the rain, and might have kept batting all day. Instead Clarke called them in 40 minutes before tea the moment the tally reached 450, catching Sri Lanka’s fielders by surprise. Clarke was not rewarded with a wicket in the period up to the interval, but his closure has left the game open to a result despite the chance of more rain interruptions over the next three days.Spin of the day
Tillakaratne Dilshan does not take kindly to being tied down, and he was helped on his way in the evening by an unfortunate piece of fielding from Ben Hilfenhaus. Posted to fine leg, Hilfenhaus’ eyes briefly lit up when Dilshan hooked at Peter Siddle and sent a top edge in his direction. But the ball died late in its path towards Hilfenhaus, and on pitching short of the crouching bowler it spun past his hands and over the rope. Siddle was aghast, but soon had the consolation of Kumar Sangakkara’s wicket.

Reading the batsman

Video footage is well and good, but there are also plenty of clues for bowlers to pick up from their opponents’ grips, back-lifts and stances

Aakash Chopra12-Aug-2010What if a bowler could read a batsman’s mind – predict how a batsman would play before bowling a ball to him or having watched him play? Wouldn’t it bolster his chances, give him leeway to plan, and buttress his skill?Some may call it wishful thinking, others a secret science, but often just looking at the grip with which a batsman holds his bat tells you something about his preferences in terms of shots, and the way he stands may help you place your fielders.Will a batsman be a good driver of the ball or more comfortable scoring off the back foot? Will he prefer scoring runs through the on side or the off? It’s important to observe the finer nuances of a batsman’s grip, stance and back-lift to size him up and plan accordingly. While it may seem utterly useless in this day and age of exhaustive analysis based on video footage, which is available to almost all professional teams, observation was one of the tools players relied heavily on in the past, and it continues to be useful.The grip
Most batsmen playing professional cricket hold the bat correctly with regard to the Vs made by thumbs and forefingers. The top hand is firmer and the V its thumb and forefinger makes opens out towards the outer edge of the bat, while the bottom hand plays only a supporting role.A correct grip allows a proper downswing, which in turn enables a batsman to play the ball with the full face of the bat. The right grip is also imperative if you want to play the entire range of shots.While the basics remain the same, lots of batsmen do enough with the grip to give some information away. For instance, Sanath Jayasuriya holds the bat close to the bottom of the handle, and Adam Gilchrist higher up. Now the coaching manual recommends that one holds the bat in the middle of the handle, but to say that successful players like these two don’t hold the bat correctly would be grossly incorrect. While there are pros and cons to each approach, it all boils down to what suits your game best.Holding the bat closer to the bottom gives you more control and helps you generate more power at the point of impact. In such cases, since the bottom hand becomes dominant very often, you don’t need a high back-lift to hit the ball long and hard. That’s why Jayasuriya is ever so good with his short-arm jabs. Such players generally are more comfortable on the back foot, and horizontal bat shots are their bread and butter. The flip side of holding the bat close to the base of the handle is that the arc of the downswing gets radically smaller, which in turn reduces the reach and makes driving off the front foot that much difficult. But some players are exceptions to this rule. Sachin Tendulkar holds the bat close to the bottom of the handle but has managed to overcome the shortcomings with ease.On the contrary, Gilchrist’s batting is built on the extension of the arms, and holding the bat high on the handle complements the extension. With this grip, the arc of the downswing becomes bigger, and hence increases the reach of the batsman. Lower-order batsmen tend to prefer this grip to enhance their reach. That’s how the phrase “using the long handle” was coined. The flip side of such a grip is that you may not have enough control and you have to rely on the downswing to generate power. Players with such grips prefer playing on the front foot and can also be a little circumspect against quick short-pitched bowling. Gilchrist, like Tendulkar, is an exception here.Then there were those like Javed Miandad, who had a gap between the top and bottom hands. The textbook recommends keeping the hands close to each other on the handle, to ensure that they move in unison. Yet Miandad’s grip allowed him to manoeuvre the bowling and milk it for singles, though he possibly sacrificed some fluency in the bargain.The stance
If the grip on the bat is the first giveaway, the manner in which a batsman stands is the second. While the coaching manual recommends the feet be about a shoulder span apart, lots of batsmen have toyed with different options to suit their game.People who stand with their feet too close to each other are often good back-foot players and the ones with wider stances are generally stronger on the front foot. Here, too, there are snags: you lose some balance if both feet are too close, and too wide apart results in lack of foot movement.A stance that’s too side-on or too open-chested also tells you a bit about the strengths and weaknesses of a batsman. While you’d be suspect against inswingers if your stance is too side-on, you’d struggle against away-going deliveries if it is too open. Sachin Tendulkar’s is the closest to what would be a perfect stance – though even he tended to lean too much towards the off side when he started.

The textbook recommends keeping the hands close to each other on the handle, to ensure that they move in unison. Yet Miandad’s grip, with hands apart, allowed him to manoeuvre the bowling and milk it for singles

Even the way you take guard can give the bowler a pointer or two. Generally players who ask for a leg-stump guard are good on the off side, for they try to make room by staying beside the line. And the ones who ask for middle stump are good on the leg side, for their endeavour is to whip it through the leg side. It’s not a hard-and-fast rule but any information is better than none at all.If a batsman is falling over, with his head not in line with his toes – which is the case with a lot of batsmen – he will predominantly be an on-side player, but would still be susceptible to sharp, incoming deliveries. Also, the intended ground shots on the leg side will probably travel in the air for a while, and hence positioning a fielder at short midwicket comes in handy. Such a batsman would also be unsure of his off stump and hence might play balls that are meant to be left alone.The back-lift
The last clues before the ball is finally bowled come from the height of the back-lift and its arc. Ideally the bat should come down from somewhere between the off stump and first slip, to ensure that the bat moves straight in the downswing.Players who bring the bat in from wider than second slip, like Rahul Dravid, need to make a loop at the top of the downswing, or else they will find it difficult to negotiate sharp incoming deliveries. Should they fail to make that loop, the bat won’t come down straight, which means meeting the ball at an angle instead of straight on.Batsmen with higher back-lifts find it difficult to deal with changes of pace, because with higher back-lifts it’s tougher to pull out of a shot after committing. Also, there’s always a possibility they will be late in bringing the bat down to keep yorkers out. Ergo, yorkers and slower ones might just do the trick.Since players with short back-lifts, like Paul Collingwood and Andrew Symonds, don’t have a reasonable downswing, they rely on the pace of the ball to generate power for their shots. They tend to struggle if the ball has no pace on it, so taking the pace off isn’t a bad move against them. On the contrary, short back-lifts are almost ideal to keep yorkers out with.If anyone has to think on his feet in cricket, it is the bowler. For it is he who initiates the action and everyone else reacts to what he delivers. Yet, these days he’s the game’s underdog, constantly at risk of being on the receiving end, and bound to follow a plan to render himself effective. Since video data isn’t available to teams before they reach a certain level, most bowlers rely on observing the finer nuances of their opponents in order to strategise.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus