Most memorable Ashes bowling performance

Vote on our shortlist of classic Ashes moments that have taken place in England since 1981

30-Jul-2013To coincide with the 2013 Investec Ashes series, we are asking you to vote on our shortlist of classic Ashes moments that have taken place in England since 1981. You can watch each episode of our series and then vote for your winner.Part 3 – most memorable bowling performanceWe have chosen the following shortlist from the great Ashes contests in England over the past 30 years.Bob Willis (Eng) 8-43, Headingley 1981
Bob Willis went to Ian Botham’s barbecue on the rest day at Headingley in 1981 convinced he would never play for England again. Then he summoned one of Test history’s greatest spells.
Scorecard | Wisden reportCraig McDermott (Aus) 6-70, Lord’s 1985
Craig McDermott rarely looked more impressive in an Australia shirt than when he took six wickets at Lord’s in 1985, a summer in which his 30 Test wickets announced his arrival on the fast-bowling scene.
Scorecard | Wisden reportShane Warne (Aus) 6-48, Old Trafford 1997
Shane Warne began 1997 by storming out of a Madame Tussauds media conference when references were made about his expanding waistline. But he was no waxwork at Old Trafford as this display silenced his critics.
Scorecard | Wisden reportGlenn McGrath (Aus) 8-38, Lord’s 1997
England made only 77 at Lord’s when Glenn McGrath took advantage of ideal bowling conditions at a ground he always loved.
Scorecard | Wisden reportJason Gillespie (Aus) 7-37, Headingley 1997
Gillespie took his Test-best figures at Headingley in 1997 and had such fond memories of the ground that he went back there to coach Yorkshire.
Scorecard | Wisden reportMost memorable bowling displaysBob Willis (Eng) 8-43, Headingley 19810% Craig McDermott (Aus) 6-70, Lord’s 19850% Shane Warne (Aus) 6-48, Old Trafford 19970% Glenn McGrath (Aus) 8-38, Lord’s 19970% Jason Gillespie (Aus) 7-37, Headingley 19970%

Create a poll like this

'I have followed the tradition of Mumbai cricket'

Amol Karhadkar16-Oct-2013
Ajit Agarkar said he felt it was time to go after Mumbai won the Ranji Trophy in 2012-13•ESPNcricinfo LtdHow do you feel after announcing the decision?
Relieved, now that I have made the decision. It was a tough decision; it wasn’t easy to let go of something that you have been passionately doing all these years.Why retire now?
Why not? I’ve thought about it. It’s not like I decided about it yesterday. You have to be at peak of your fitness and motivated enough to last a full season.But the Mumbai selectors were set to name you as captain for yet another season …
It’s ok. I should be as motivated as others. It was the right time for me. One more season was not going to change much. It could only have meant I would have been around for one more season and one of the youngsters would have been benched for Mumbai. I don’t have a chance to play for India, so I thought it was the right time. Moreover, it’s not a young (Mumbai) team anymore. It’s a well-balanced unit and I feel it was time to let the younger lot carry the mantle.Are you moving away from the trend set by players who continue playing, or move to other states as professionals towards the latter stages of their careers?
I have been primarily playing for last six years only to groom youngsters. How many fast bowlers would have continued to play for six years after playing their last international game? The only purpose to continue playing once I realised I was not going to play for India again was to pass on my experience to youngsters. That is the tradition of Mumbai cricket and I have followed it.Was there a particular moment that made you realise it was time to go?
When we won the final last year. It was a long, hard season. I was mentally and physically drained and thought I should hang up my boots. Then I thought I would give myself the off-season before taking the call. I was still training. I wanted to check if I was ready for yet another hard season. When you come closer to the season, you start getting excited about it. But I knew it was getting harder for me to be right up there. I still gave it a try but when I realised the body wasn’t responding – physically and emotionally – there was no point continuing with it.Weren’t you tempted to reach 300 first-class wickets and play with SachinTendulkar one last time?
What will that do? When I started last year’s final, I knew I was on 295. That was the first time I actually knew about my stats. I still stopped bowling after taking three wickets in the first six overs. If those landmarks were to happen, they would have happened last season. Had it been a landmark in international cricket, maybe I would have thought about it. But Dhawal (Kulkarni) needs a five-for more than me now.The last three-four seasons had been stop-start for you. Has there been too much of wear and tear on the body to continue playing?
I am in my thirties. It’s hard even for a young bowler who is at his peak. The conditions, the travelling, it all takes a lot out of you. It’s a reality that every professional cricketer has to deal with it. When you have to bowl 30 to 40 overs, travel for a day and then take the field again in a couple of days and keep on doing it every week, it’s tough.To continue playing IPL would obviously have been tempting for you?
Not at all. IPL is a fantastic tournament, no doubt. Even for a player like me, it presents an opportunity to play with and against quality international cricketers. Also, financially it’s very rewarding. However, since I haven’t played international cricket for the last five years, I would anyway be an uncapped cricketer. Still, there was no consideration to give it a go only for financial reasons. If I had to continue playing, I would have continued playing all forms of the same.How would you sum up the whole journey?
Fantastic. I have absolutely no complaints. To have collected almost 350 international wickets was an absolute privilege. So was scoring a Test century. I was fortunate to have my name in the list of honours at two of the most special venues in international cricket, Lord’s and Adelaide Oval. Won seven Ranji titles with Mumbai. You always want more but you don’t get it. Very happy. I could actually finish after winning a Ranji title. That is how it had started, so very happy that it culminated in the same way.What next now?
I don’t know. It’s taken a while for the decision to be made. But now that I have done it, I want to enjoy it as much as I can. Obviously it would be good if I can stay connected with the game in some form. But for now, I just need to enjoy myself and spend a lot of quality time with my family and friends.

A series lost from winning positions

India might have been winless in New Zealand but their young side created several winning positions. They have too much talent for results not to go their way sooner rather than later

Abhishek Purohit19-Feb-2014India go back from New Zealand with a 40-run loss in Auckland and a disappointing draw in Wellington. While MS Dhoni spoke at length about the improvements he had seen in his side – and there were plenty of positives – with a bit more application and luck India could have taken the series 2-0.Being optimistic is the way to go, but you were also left with the feeling that the management’s expectations from the young side might not have been sky high. However, considering the positions they built for themselves, India should feel disappointed for not winning at all, especially when they won the toss each time on pitches that lost bite after the first couple of sessions.India needed 185 to win with eight wickets remaining in Auckland. Shikhar Dhawan and Virat Kohli had stunned New Zealand with an aggressive century partnership. Then Kohli went after Neil Wagner, lost his wicket and India eventually fell short by not too many. In Wellington, Kohli dropped Brendon McCullum on 9, and India could do nothing as the New Zealand captain converted a 246-run deficit into a 434-run lead.The world can debate whether Dhoni should have had one or many slips, or placed Kohli five inches back at short mid-on, where he put McCullum down. McCullum himself had just one slip for large parts of India’s second innings, and had no intention of pushing for a win given his belated declaration, but that will not matter to a world that concluded long ago that Dhoni is defensive and McCullum is aggressive.In time, when the rush for finding causes subsides, history will record that McCullum played one of the great innings in Test cricket, with worthy support acts from BJ Watling and Jimmy Neesham. However, the fact remains, as Dhoni admitted, that India were unable to close out the match. More so in Wellington, and to a lesser extent in Auckland.Through the series, Dhoni spoke about the need for his batsmen to capitalise when they were in. Barring the first-innings meltdown in Auckland, India posted 421, 438 and 166 for 3. There has never been any doubt about the potential of this top six, and in South Africa that potential had been evident in difficult conditions. In New Zealand, they showed that the potential is more likely to be fulfilled than wasted.Dhawan’s successive knocks of 98 and 115 have to be India’s biggest individual gains from this series. He has shown the willingness and the ability to respect the conditions and the bowlers. Among the top six, only Rohit Sharma is without a big innings on either of these tours, although he did help Kohli bat time for the draw in Wellington. Before South Africa, India would have gladly taken five out of six.It was refreshing to see Dhoni make crucial contributions with the bat in both Tests. He played on for 39 after rattling New Zealand in Auckland, but the 68 in Wellington once again showed how much he can hurt sides in Tests. Ajinkya Rahane’s maiden hundred was almost flawless but it was Dhoni’s assault on Wagner that turned the momentum India’s way.India’s fast bowlers are not usually recipients of praise, but how quickly they came back from the poor display in the first innings in Auckland. Their intensity was a sight to watch as they rolled New Zealand for 105 in the second innings.They did the job for Dhoni on a helpful day-one surface in Wellington too, but their second innings effort was gargantuan. It is perhaps possible to forget in this modern age that bowlers are still humans. For a 35-year old to have to deliver 51 overs in one innings must border on physical and mental torture. And for them to be full of purpose, and for him to zoom in with the third new ball as if he was starting a fresh innings was incredible. After the highs and lows of South Africa, and the surprising ineptness of the first innings at Eden Park, Zaheer Khan told us he is not just an on-field bowling coach yet.For once, Ishant Sharma bowled like a man who has played 50-plus Tests, barring large parts of the Auckland first innings. In time Mohammed Shami will hopefully realise it pays to use some discretion while going flat out. And India already know they cannot keep dropping top opposition batsmen. Kane Williamson made them pay in Auckland, and McCullum in Wellington.On the whole, it was the first innings with ball and bat in Auckland that cost India the series. They had more than their share of chances and sooner rather than later they are bound to take their share of the spoils as well. They have too much collective and individual promise not to. But New Zealand 2014 is the one that got away.

UAE's fitness issues, no consolation for Zimbabwe

A look at how the Associate teams fared in Group B of the qualifying round of the World T20

ESPNcricinfo staff21-Mar-2014UAESeveral of UAE’s batsmen got in before giving it away•ICCProgress: UAE were the only side among the eight teams in the first round to end without a win, and that really told the story, in a format where even Test nations Bangladesh and Zimbabwe were downed once each by Associate sides. They did seem to get it together in their last match, giving Zimbabwe an almighty scare, showing they were capable of competing, but that was when they were under no pressure – their exit from the tournament had already been confirmed. As their captain Khurram Khan said, just turning out at this level had taught his side so much.What to work on: Professionalism exists at top rungs of the Associate level and UAE were clearly found out, their poor fitness as part-time cricketers not allowing them to keep up with their opponents. Their fielding and catching was abysmal in their opening game against Netherlands, and even against Zimbabwe, they dropped crucial chances that, if taken, could have perhaps conjured a different ending. Better fitness will only come if are in a position to devote more time to the game. Also, too often they lost wickets in clumps after building a partnership, undoing all the hard work done till that stage. Their bowlers were nothing more than steady overall, although they didn’t get enough runs from the batsmen and support from the fielders.Player to watch: Led by the veteran Khurram Khan, UAE’s middle order showed potential, batsmen such as Shaiman Anwar, Swapnil Patil and Rohan Mustafa got in before giving it away. They never seemed to be able to resist having a slog or two to break free from the stranglehold of dot balls, and if they can work on that, they seem to have a promising, spirited line-up. Kamran Shazad was one seamer who worked up some pace in UAE’s ageing attack.IrelandProgress: Their shock exit is an anomaly. Ireland are a team primed for big-time cricket, and it showed in how they dominated Zimbabwe in their first qualifying match. They will have to quickly forget what happened in those 13.5 overs against Netherlands in Sylhet and begin focusing on the 2015 World Cup, for which they qualified last year.What to work on: Ireland need to fill the gap left by Boyd Rankin, who left to play for England. They are missing a genuinely quick bowler who can wrest control in situations like when Netherlands ran riot in Sylhet.Player to watch: One bad over against Netherlands should not dissuade the progress of the otherwise impressive Andy McBrine. The 20-year old bowled impressively against Zimbabwe, and was sparingly used by Ireland. He is one for the future, forming a partnership with George Dockrell.ZimbabweProgress: Zimbabwe would not have wanted to be left searching forpositives after an early exit from the World T20. Netherlands did raise their hopes briefly before dashing them, but Zimbabwe know that they were left with too much catching up to do after going down in their most critical game, their opener against Ireland. They did what they were expected to against Netherlands and UAE, but both wins were not without stutters. Two wins out of three for a side that had not played any international cricket for around six months may be seen as an achievement, but that will be scant consolation for Brendan Taylor and his men.What to work on: Zimbabwe missed thrust up the order, something Netherlands relied so much on. They could have had Elton Chigumbura batting higher up, a move that did not succeed against Netherlands. The decision to open with Sikandar Raza instead of the more experienced and explosive Vusi Sibanda did not work through the tournament. To their misfortune, both their key bowlers Prosper Utseya and Tinashe Panyangara had off days against Ireland, although Panyangara came back strongly with a top spell at the death.Player to keep an eye on: That spell of Panyangara’s nearly brought back Zimbabwe from the dead against Ireland, who needed just seven off 13 but had to rely on a last-ball bye to win. He found swing, he got the yorkers in, and he had Ireland panicking. Tendai Chatara was superb through the campaign with his cutters and controlled changes of pace.

Loyal crowd wills Cook forward

Alastair Cook was under the greatest pressure of his career, but the Southampton crowd was determined to will him forward

George Dobell27-Jul-2014In the late 1960s, with flower-power and hippiedom at their peak, a large group gathered in central London determined to prove the power of positive thinking. If they all concentrated on the same thought at the same time, they believed they could move a building an inch to its left.It was a similar story at The Ageas Bowl on the first day of the third Investec Test. You could feel the goodwill for England’s captain around the ground. You feel the desperation among the spectators, among his teammates, among the coaching staff and even among the majority of the UK media, that Alastair Cook would end his run drought and register his first Test century since May 2013.Yet, just as the hippies were unable to move that building, so Cook was unable to complete his century. All the goodwill, all the desperation, all the positive thinking was unable to take him the extra inch.But this innings was no failure. There is too much emphasis on personal milestones in this team game and, just as an innings of 100 would have been celebrated as much as an innings of 105, so this innings of 95 still demonstrated many of Cook’s admirable qualities, not least his well-organised batting, his determination and his leadership skills.It was a brave decision to bat first. A weaker captain, a weaker man, might have seen the green-tinged wicket and used it as an excuse to delay his examination. Cook could easily have chosen to bowl first – as the captain had in the last 10 first-class games at the ground – and hidden behind the explanation that he wanted to give his seamers first use of the wicket. But he knew, deep down, that was the wrong decision for the team and, as ever, he put the team first.Then, despite a tangible lack of confidence and, as he put it, “under the greatest pressure he had ever been under” he produced the innings his side so desperately required. It was not pretty, it was not smooth and it was not without mistakes.There were times, with Cook thrusting his hands towards the ball as if trying to remember how he used to bat, when he timed the ball so horribly that you could almost feel the jarring sensation in his arms. And there were times, with the ball making a dead sound after a stroke, when it appeared he might be playing with a piece of driftwood rather than a finely-crafted bat. It was, for the most part, a desperate struggle.Cook admits pressure never been higher

Alastair Cook has admitted he felt he had been “letting people down” after responding toi the greatest pressure he had felt in his career with his first Test half-century of the calendar year. Cook’s position as captain, and his place in the side, had been questioned after a spell of 10 Tests without a win for England and 27 innings without a century for Cook. H responded with 95, although he was dropped on 15.
“It’s been a tough six months,” Cook said. “And it’s still going to be tough. But I feel I have a good attitude to the job. The most pleasing aspect of that innings was that, under the most pressure I’ve ever been under as a player, with everyone telling me to stop doing it and that I’m not worth my place… this is a lovely place to be.
“I’d have loved that extra five runs. I have mixed feelings now. But if you had offered me 95 at the start of play, I would have bitten your hand off.
“It’s a sense of contributing to the team. I can’t tell you have frustrating it is as a batter when you keep not scoring runs. You sit back there in the dressing room and everyone is supporting you, but you still feel as if you’re letting people down.
“It was quite hard work, but it’s just a matter of grinding it. I’ve always fought throughout my career, but sometimes you need some luck and I have not always had much.”
Cook also paid tribute to the support of the crowd at the Ageas Bowl, saying he had “never experienced anything like it.” He added: “It was an amazing reception. You never silence everyone. But this innings has given me confidence that my batting is going in the right direction again.”

But Cook was never a batsman that you would fall in love with; he was a batsman you could rely upon. And it is reliance, not romance, that England need now.It would be wrong, though, to suggest this innings answers all the criticism of Cook. It has done little to prove him a good tactician; it has done little to prove him an inspirational leader; it has done little to suggest he is at the start of a golden run of form.Many county batsmen, if granted 28 consecutive opportunities, would contribute a sizeable innings every so often. The worth of a good Test batsman is contributing consistently. Cook still has to build upon this innings. It if takes another 20 innings for him to contribute, he will have failed. Only Mike Brearley has played more consecutive innings as an England captain and failed to score a century.There was enduring evidence of some of his technical frailties, too. On a quicker pitch, he might have been caught in the slips from his first ball; instead the edge dropped short. On another day, he would have been caught in the slips on 15; instead Ravi Jadeja put down a relatively simple chance. And on another day, on 29, he might have been caught off the thick edge that flew through gully to the boundary. Luck will always play a large part in this game and Cook also benefited from a slow-paced wicket, a slight off-day from India’s seamers and some modest fare from the support bowlers.But he earned the short balls and wide deliveries. By leaving better outside off stump, by playing straighter, by retaining his patience and composure despite the pressure, he forced the bowlers into attempting different methods of attack and, gradually, they began to feed his strengths. Not one ball was driven to the boundary in the V between mid-off and mid-on, but he cut and pulled often. He will always be a limited player, but when he plays within those limitations he is a mightily effective one.And, if the runs alone were not enough to remind onlookers of his worth, Cook also passed Kevin Pietersen and David Gower in the list of England’s highest run-scorers in Test cricket. He is just 29, remember, and only Alec Stewart and Graham Gooch have scored more than him now.This was not the end of Cook’s journey, but it was a step in the right direction.

A prolific debut at No. 8, and Anderson levels with Trueman

Stats highlights from the Trent Bridge Test, a match in which all kinds of lower-order batting feats were eclipsed

S Rajesh13-Jul-20141 – The number of draws at Trent Bridge in the last 11 Tests here. The last time a Test was drawn here was also when India played, in 2002.46.34 – The average runs per wicket in the Test, which is only the third time the average has gone past 40 in 17 Tests here since 1996. All three of those matches have involved India: the average was 49.92 in 2002, and 46.28 in 1996. In the ten Tests between 2003 and 2013 – each of which ended in a decisive result – the average runs per wicket here was 28.95.325 – The number of runs scored by Nos. 9 to 11 in the match, which is the second-highest in Test history. The only instance of more runs was at The Oval in 1966, in a Test between West Indies and England, when 329 runs were scored by the last three batsmen. England’s last three contributed 234 of those, with John Murray scoring 112, Ken Higgs 63, and John Snow 59.1 – The number of times, in the last two years, that a Test has been drawn with only three innings being played, and with no interruption from the weather. That happened in Nagpur in 2012, between the same two teams: Twenty-three wickets fell in that Test, with England batting 145.5 and 154 overs in their two innings, and India batting 143 in theirs.78 – Stuart Binny’s score in the second innings, the second-highest by any Indian batting at No. 8 or lower on debut. Only Deepak Shodhan, who made 110 in his first Test, against Pakistan in Kolkata in 1952, has scored more.2 – The number of fifties for Bhuvneshwar Kumar in the Test, making him only the second player – after Peter Siddle – to score fifties in each innings when batting at No. 9 or lower in a Test. Siddle scored 51 and 50 against India in Delhi in 2013.4 – The number of Indian players who’ve made two 50-plus scores and taken a five-for in a Test, like Bhuvneshwar did at Trent Bridge. The other Indians who did so before him also achieved it in overseas Tests: Rusi Surti (in 1967 in Adelaide), Polly Umrigar (in 1962 at Port of Spain), and Vinoo Mankad (at Lord’s in 1952). Overall, this feat has been achieved 14 times in Tests.229 – The number of Test wickets for James Anderson in England, which equals Fred Trueman’s record. Trueman took his wickets in 47 Tests, at an average of 20.04, while Anderson has played 54, and averages 27.30 in England.4 – The number of Man-of-the-Match awards for Anderson at Trent Bridge, out of the six he has won in his entire Test career. He was also MoM here last year, with match figures of 10 for 158 against Australia. The next best at Trent Bridge is Graham Thorpe, with two at this venue. 3 – The number of times, before this Test, that India didn’t lose the first Test of a series in England – in 1971, 1986 and 2007. On each of those occasions, they went on to win the series.

New Zealand's Sharjah records, and aged debutants

Also, most twin fifties in Tests, and a correction about most first-class wickets in a calendar year

Steven Lynch02-Dec-2014Who has scored the most twin fifties in Test cricket? And who has the record for twin centuries? asked Dhanushka Edussuriya from Sri Lanka
Ricky Ponting reached 50 twice in the same Test on the most occasions – he did it 15 times in all. Three of those involved twin hundreds, a record he shares with Sunil Gavaskar. Jacques Kallis scored two fifties in a Test on 14 occasions and Allan Border 13, while so far Kumar Sangakkara has done it 12 times and Shivnarine Chanderpaul 11. Inzamam-ul-Haq also managed it 11 times, while those on ten are Greg Chappell, Alastair Cook and Rahul Dravid.How many Tests have New Zealand won by an innings, as they did at Sharjah? asked Andrew Talbot from England
New Zealand’s thumping win over Pakistan in Sharjah last week was their 21st innings victory in Tests, of which nine have come against Bangladesh or Zimbabwe. Their first such win was against India in Wellington in 1975-76, and 12 of them have come in the current century. New Zealand have beaten Pakistan by an innings twice before: in Hamilton in 2000-01, and in Auckland in 1984-85. For the full list, click here. New Zealand’s total of 690 in Sharjah was their highest in Tests, beating 680 for 8 dec against India in Wellington earlier this year. It was also the highest total against Pakistan in Tests, apart from West Indies’ 790 for 3 declared in Kingston in 1957-58, in the innings in which Garry Sobers made 365 not out.Is Mark Craig the first New Zealand player to take ten wickets and score a fifty in the same Test? asked Richard Webb from Finland
Mark Craig took 10 for 203, and also scored 65 in the first innings, in the victory in Sharjah last week. He’s actually the fifth New Zealander to achieve this particular double. Richard Hadlee managed it three times – against West Indies in Dunedin in 1979-80, v Australia in Brisbane in 1985-86 (when he took 15 wickets in the match), and v England at Trent Bridge in 1986 – while Chris Cairns (against West Indies in Hamilton in 1999-2000), Dion Nash (v England at Lord’s in 1994) and Daniel Vettori (v Sri Lanka in Wellington in 2006-07) each managed it once.There were 22 sixes in New Zealand’s innings at Sharjah. Was this a record? asked Asim Ahmed from Pakistan
New Zealand’s 22 sixes in their 690 in Sharjah was indeed a Test record, easily surpassing the 17 hit by Australia against Zimbabwe in Perth in 2003-04 – Matthew Hayden smacked 11 of those on his way to 380, the highest individual Test score at the time. For the full list, click here. I was surprised when I read, about Don Bradman’s first Test, that his fellow debutant Bert Ironmonger was 46. Who is the oldest on this list? asked Khalil Waleed from Saudi Arabia
The unorthodox left-arm spinner Bert Ironmonger was aged 46 years 237 days when he made his Test debut against England in Brisbane in 1928-29. He was Australia’s oldest debutant, a record he held for… a fortnight, before offspinner Don Blackie – who played with Ironmonger at the St Kilda club in Melbourne – made his debut in the second Test in Sydney, aged 46 years 253 days! Blackie and Ironmonger were born two days apart in 1882. Only two men have been older in their first Tests: James Southerton was 49 when he played for England in the first Test of all, in Melbourne in 1876-77, while Miran Bakhsh was 47 on debut for Pakistan against India in Lahore in 1954-55. For the full list, click here.There’s an update to last week’s question about the most wickets in a calendar year, from James Thompson from Australia
“Actually there is someone who took more than Tich Freeman’s 356 wickets in 1928 – the Australian Charles “Terror” Turner claimed 365 in 1888, with 283 of them coming on that year’s tour of England.” This is quite right: I’d looked at the probable English suspects, but hadn’t checked any overseas players. I’m glad I put “I think” – but apologies for the misleading information. Turner’s feats in England in 1888 were quite amazing: his wickets came in 36 matches, at an average of 11.68. His opening partner, Jack Ferris, finished with 199 wickets, so they took 482 between them – no one else took more than 43.

The bunny bites back

James Anderson had tormented Lahiru Thirimanne on their previous meetings but the roles were emphatically reversed in Wellington

Andrew Fidel Fernando in Wellington01-Mar-20152:37

‘Sangakkara’s innings eased pressure’ – Thirimanne

The best bowlers in the world have a way of scrambling young batsmen’s brains. In the last English summer, James Anderson eroded Lahiru Thirimanne’s game so intensely, it sometimes seemed he only needed to sneeze in Thirimanne’s direction to reduce him to dust.Thirimanne by then was no easy target. This was a man who had won his team an Asia Cup months before, and played crucial innings in a World T20 win – including a top-score in the semi-final. But as Anderson sent poison down that fifth stump line that would later enfeeble Virat Kohli as well, Thirimanne’s belief grew frailer and frailer. Sri Lanka persevered with him till the end of the tour but, not long after, he was dropped.

***

Nine days after Tim Southee’s swing had eviscerated England on the same pitch in Wellington, Thirimanne is crouched and tense as Anderson steams in. The first ball – a short one on the hips – is defused into the leg side.Anderson himself is not at his best this World Cup. But if there is a top-order batsman in the world he would fancy throwing him a cheap wicket, it would be Thirimanne. Across all internationals, he has had his scalp 10 times. So he begins pushing it across the batsman next over, trialling a variety of lengths, but staying largely on the same line, like a fisherman angling at his lucky spot on the river.For now, Thirimanne doesn’t bite. He is back and across to defend with the full face when Anderson drops short. Forward and across when he is full. For four balls he does this, then something strange happens. Thirimanne is the man suddenly waiting for Anderson to stray. He gets one on the pads. He works it away.

***

Daryl Cullinan despises being known as Shane Warne’s bunny. For batsmen, being repeatedly dismissed by a bowler is so much worse than simply having a weakness against a particular team. Fans begin to talk about it. Worse, they begin to joke about it. This is the batsman’s livelihood. For young cricketers especially, batting is also an integral part of their identity. It cuts close to the bone when you become an incompetent in the public imagination.There were whispers early in England’s ODI tour of Sri Lanka that Moeen Ali’s offspin had a hold over Kumar Sangakkara. At this stage of his career, Sangakkara is in no mood to suffer this. He worked the spinner out and top-scored in that series. In the Tests against New Zealand, when suggestions that he was weak against Trent Boult began to emerge, Sangakkara went to the nets again. He would hit a first-innings double ton against New Zealand in the next match.

***

Thirimanne is on strike again as Anderson begins his third over. The ball is full, just wide of off stump again but, once more, Thirimanne has his foot to the pitch of the ball, and this time meets it with a drive. It travels briefly in the air, but it’s too straight to interest the mid-off fielder. He gets his first intentional boundary. The belief grows again. There is an ambitious lofted drive two balls later, which fetches the batsman two. Next over Anderson is picked away on the leg side for another couple.It is in the ninth over – Anderson’s fifth – when the battle really begins to turn. Anderson is coming around the wicket now. How many times in his career has he straightened balls down the line to left-handers, and caught them plumb in front? Yet, even with only 13 runs having been scored off his first four overs, he feels the need to change his angle, and virtually rule out a mode of dismissal. The pitch is not helping. The angler is growing impatient.Lahiru Thirimanne became the youngest World Cup centurion for Sri Lanka•AFPThe first ball is full, wide and juicy – exactly the kind Thirimanne was getting out to at Old Trafford and Edgbaston – but he is on bended knee in Wellington now, creaming this one through a crammed cover field. The shoe is switching feet. The tables are turning. Anderson is under fire now. Thirimanne has got him on hook.Four balls later, he pitches one up to Thirimanne again, angling it slightly, hoping to shape it away. Thirimanne batsman sees it is too wide. Out comes the drive again, but this it is an even bolder rendition. He opens the face and cracks it square. It’s coming out of the middle. It’s scorching a line to the fence. Thirimanne admires the shot, stands tall and looks toward the southern stand. Sri Lankan flags are billowing. Thirimanne is winning this one.That over, which cost 10, would be the final one in Anderson’s spell. Anderson would come back during the Powerplay and almost have Thirimanne caught, but the batsman was already on 98 at that stage. In the end, Anderson would bowl exactly half of his 48 deliveries at Thirimanne, and Thirimanne would hit him for more than a run-a-ball.Another England tour is scheduled for Sri Lanka in 2016 and Thirimanne will meet his nemesis again. But he has hit a hundred against Anderson now. He is the youngest batsman to make a World Cup hundred for a country that has seen a lot of batting talent bloom at these events. Next time they meet, fans might remember Thirimanne’s immense role in this outstanding chase. Next time they meet, no one will be laughing.

India's spinners rush through Ireland

India hustled Ireland with speed and pace: not pace bowling or impressive readings on the speed gun, bouncers and yorkers, but a foot-on-the-pedal approach with bat and ball which left Ireland with little time to think

Sharda Ugra in Hamilton10-Mar-20151:50

Agarkar: Ashwin’s variations in pace excellent

Hamilton has always moved slowly. It is surrounded by dairy country, traffic is scant, courteous and proceeds moodily. For a short while, it had hosted a V8 Supercar series motor racing event on a 69-lap street circuit, but not after 2011. These days, the most hairy incident in town may possibly involve the sudden screeching of brakes to avoid stray pets.On Tuesday, though in a lively, crowded Seddon Park, offering a cornucopia of music, noise and vibe, Hamilton was witness to cricket that lasted 86 high-velocity overs and left everyone, but mostly Ireland, breathless. When the noise died down, India won with 79 balls to spare and an extra free hour on their hands.India hustled Ireland with speed and pace: not pace bowling or impressive readings on the speed gun, bouncers and yorkers, but a foot-on-the-pedal approach with ball and bat which left Ireland with little time to think. It has given India top billing in their group making their quarter-final opponent the lowest-ranked Group A team. Knockouts may be very thin ice, but the knowledge that the opposition is a relatively weaker side does help a team stay more sure-footed.The irony was that all told, the Irish did not fare as badly as India’s other opponents in this World Cup so far. They started by putting up the highest score against the Indian bowling in the tournament. Yet, going by a flat deck, Seddon Park’s history, their own limited bowling reserves, a total of 259 must have told them that they had been had. In the first World Cup game here, Zimbabwe had scored 277 in reply to South Africa’s 339.India’s pace bowlers had a rare imperfect start as William Porterfield went after Umesh Yadav, Paul Stirling pounced on Mohammed Shami and Mohit Sharma at the slight error of length. The first ten overs saw Ireland score 60 (57 off the pacers in the first nine), the most runs conceded by India during those overs in this World Cup. It was not McCullumesque monumentalism, but it displayed Irish intent.The spinners came on in the tenth over and within five, Ireland were entangled. In the space of 62 minutes, India bowled 22 overs, a rate which even had the ground scorer “hopping.”In that period, Ireland scored 87 runs for the loss of two wickets, and the boundaries dried up because of R Ashwin and Suresh Raina. All sorts was offered to Ireland: Raina’s offspinners were fired in with the wicket gripping a little and he raced through his quota of ten and sent back Ed Joyce, who made room and found himself bowled by one that was neither short nor wide. Ashwin altered his pace, held the ball back from the struggling Irishmen and by the time the spin-cycle ended, more than half their innings was gone and there was only 144 on the scoreboard. Their third wicket wicket fell as soon as Mohit returned, which marked what was to be a tipping point.Niall O’Brien said of the spinners’ over rates: “[It was] good play, smart cricket…their spinners don’t have much of a run up, they try to sneak through the overs, they kept the run rate down.”MS Dhoni said he had been tempted to bring the spinners on early. “If this was an important game for us, maybe I would have brought in the spinners closer to the fourth over. But I still went ahead with the fast bowlers in the first ten overs, then I felt let’s get the most out of this game.” His bowling changes needed to be, he said, “flexible.””I wanted the fast bowlers to have a bit more go also. I thought maybe I can still use the new ball, get a few nicks if possible. The new ball was coming on nicely to the bat, even though the slower one was getting stuck a bit. So I thought let’s go ahead with the fast bowlers for a bit more time and (then) bring on the spinners. That’s what I really did.”Ireland’s plan, their captain Porterfield said later, had been to “not to go too hard too soon” knowing the size of the ground and the state of the wicket. While he said Ireland were not affected by the speed of the spinners racing through their overs and gave due credit to the Indian bowlers, but added that the batsmen were unable to form the platform going into the 30-plus overs. “We didn’t catch things at the back end and lost wickets as well,” he said.Cause and the effect can get a bit blurred with that kind of argument, but the end result was that Ireland found themselves with an under-par score and India were able to control the pace of play.India’s batsmen could not have asked for more, certainly not Rohit Sharma who has so far had an average kind of World Cup. A belter, medium-paced bowling, and the cosy proximity of boundaries. Two dropped chances of Dhawan, both off Mooney within the first seven overs and the game was over. It gave Dhawan what Dhoni called his “15 minutes,” which like most batsmen, he too needs to settle in.Once set, Dhawan pulled out a range of his strokes, a swivel-pull off Kevin O’Brien and a six off one hand to George Dockrell were things of both beauty and power. India rocketed to 73 off their first ten overs and the target was not chased as much as wolfed down. Rohit fell for 64, trying to dab Stuart Thompson a tad too cleverly and playing on, but more urgency followed. As Rohit trudged back glumly, he was crossed by an onrushing Virat Kohli, who headed for the wicket like a commuter with a train to catch. Or in keeping with Kohli the superstar, the last guy rushing into business class before the gates are drawn shut.India have moved so quickly through this World Cup, that they are looking too hard to slow down.

Bangladesh eager to catch giants 'off guard'

To merely give India a good game won’t be enough at this stage – a knockout is sudden death and being ‘valiant losers’ stands for nothing when you are packing your bags as winners are trumpeting their success

Sharda Ugra in Melbourne16-Mar-2015There are, according to 2011 census figures, just over 27,000 Bangladesh-born Australian residents and the entire state of Victoria has a little over 5000. If each and every Bangladesh-born human being in Australia turned up to cheer for their team in the World Cup quarter-final against India on Thursday, they could easily be drowned by the noise generated by expatriate and travelling fans on the other side.Yet, Bangladesh would know that, on the biggest day in their country’s cricket, they would want to generate not merely the noise of the crowd, but a sonic boom that carries home to their millions of fans. To be able to do that, they would have to bring amongst themselves, a certain stillness of being and yet acute presence of mind.It is what Bangladesh are trying to do: the team has shut itself out from individual attention to media demands and they are grateful for their itinerant travels during the group stages which would make MS Dhoni and his Support Staff XI very cross. Bangladesh have gone from Canberra to Brisbane to Melbourne, to Nelson in New Zealand, back to Adelaide and then another time-difference buster back to Hamilton. The travel has also kept the Bangladesh squad away from excessive attention of local fans in the larger centres. It’s not that they are absent.The MCG today had scatterings of families taking photographs and inching close to the field where the Bangladeshis trained, but they were a miniscule presence in the great bulk of the ground. The last time Bangladesh had turned up in the World Cup, they gave hosts New Zealand their most nervy game of the competition. Yet, to merely give the Indians a good game won’t be enough at this stage – a knockout is sudden death and being ‘valiant losers’ stands for nothing when you are packing your bags as winners are trumpeting their success.Yet, at the moment, the main point is that Bangladesh are here. Where they had originally intended to be, in the knockout stage of the competition, their first target through this competition. Collect the points, any which way, get in contention and see what happens on the day. What happens next, though, depends on other factors.Of the least concern to coach Chandika Hathurusingha was the prospect of an afternoon thunderstorm being predicted somewhere or the fact that India’s spinners could have a feast in terms of their options on the vast expanse of the MCG. “See, we can’t plan anything for weather and I don’t think the wicket is going to spin that much, it is too early to say.” Hathurusingha said that the quarter-final would be held on the same strip that hosted Bangladesh’s match against Sri Lanka. That scoresheet read like a vintage Bangladesh dark day, but that was well before they turned England turtle and Rubel Hussain hit 140kph.Hathurusingha, who had earned his stripes as a coach with New South Wales and later the Sydney Thunder, said his team was peaking at the right time and their best chance was being at the top of their game on the big day and “catching the established sides off guard… if they have an ordinary day and if we play to our potential we can beat any side.”Potential can often be used as a euphemism for underperforming sides or to cover game-day efforts; in the case of Bangladesh, though, they have been able to show off their stuff and what they are capable of, at the sharper end of the tournament. The new centrifugal force of their batting has been Mahmudullah, and Soumya Sarkar is a confident gen-next figure. Like all great competitors and skillful athletes, Shakib Al Hasan has no doubt spent years waiting for a day like this.The last India-Bangladesh World Cup match was the opening game of 2011 event in Dhaka, but whenever the sides resume their skirmishes no one forgets Queen’s Park Oval 2007 and the ambush on India. Mushfiqur Rahim, Shakib, Tamim Iqbal and Mashrafe Mortaza belong to the class of 2007, and will allow themselves a little giggle. Hathurusingha said that the team did not talk about that match at all. “Because that is in the past and I don’t think we have [talked about it]. Until you reminded me [about the four players], I don’t even know about it.”India have had their revenge for that match in 2007, but this is an ICC event knockout match, and they remain among the strongest teams of the competition. Hathurusingha is not about to make the giant angry: he does not throw down any gauntlets or offer any lip to the Indians. His role is to keep his team’s temperatures down, to ensure decision making in the camp is clear and as free of emotion as it can be. He said the team which on Thursday “enjoys the occasion,” will succeed. He would want the young men under his charge to “enjoy the opportunity that has represented itself” in front of Bangladesh, over and above the fear of instant death and opportunities. “For us it’s the first time but we know we are good enough and that’s why we are here.”An entire nation is on the edge of its sofas.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus